From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/clone09.c: add kernel version check
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 04:57:40 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <986027145.19743530.1506070660802.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505785364-22465-1-git-send-email-yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
----- Original Message -----
> 1) On all kernels which support CONFIG_NET_NS, clone(2) only could return
> EINVAL due to disabled CONFIG_NET_NS instead of unknown flags. Please
> see the following kernel code in net/core/net_namespace.c:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> struct net *copy_net_ns(unsigned long flags, struct net *old_net)
> ...
> #ifndef CONFIG_NET_NS
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> #endif
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The support is introduced in kernel:
> '9dd776b ("[NET]: Add network namespace clone & unshare support.")'
>
> 2) Usually, a syscall flags should always include a check of the following
> form in its implementation:
> ---------------------------------
> if (flags & ~(FL_XXX | FL_YYY))
> return -EINVAL;
> ---------------------------------
>
> This check could verify unknown flags, but clone(2) does not have the
> check and just returns 0, this issue has been around for several years,
> and it is hardly to be fixed since doing so would break existing
> applications.
>
> Please see the following URL for detailed information:
> https://lwn.net/Articles/588444/
>
> It is hard to make out whether CLONE_NEWNET is supported or not by
> returned value and errno.
>
> According to above reasons and clone()'s manpage, i think we should
> add kernel version check to skip this case on an old kernel and update
> description about EINVAL.
>
Pushed.
Thanks,
Jan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-22 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-20 9:25 [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/clone09.c: skip this test if net ns is not supported Xiao Yang
2017-07-20 12:17 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-09-18 11:23 ` Xiao Yang
2017-09-19 1:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/clone09.c: add kernel version check Xiao Yang
2017-09-22 8:57 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=986027145.19743530.1506070660802.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox