public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Cervesato via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: "Li Wang" <liwang@redhat.com>, <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Cc: Pradeep Susarla <pradeep.susarla@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] libs: adopt lib* prefix instead of tst_* for libs/
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 13:59:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DFMMND84JK0B.27NIM2SX4YYGR@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260109023914.45555-1-liwang@redhat.com>

Hi!

I generally agree with this approach, but I have the feeling we are
mixing naming a bit here. For instance, we have headers like ipcmsg.h
that has no functions starting with tst_*, while tst_numa.h does. Also,
the tst_* prefix for files has the clear goal to state we are importing
some LTP functionalities inside the tests code.

Said so, I would rather rename all LTP libraries as tst_*.h and to
rename functions inside them with tst_* prefix. In this way, we know
at the very first look, when a library is imported from LTP and not
from other sources.


-- 
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-12 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-09  2:39 [LTP] [PATCH] libs: adopt lib* prefix instead of tst_* for libs/ Li Wang via ltp
2026-01-09  3:07 ` Li Wang via ltp
2026-01-12 12:59 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp [this message]
2026-01-12 14:10   ` Li Wang via ltp
2026-01-13 11:51     ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-13 13:30       ` Jan Stancek via ltp
2026-01-13 13:41         ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-01-14  3:03           ` Li Wang via ltp
2026-01-14  8:51             ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-14 10:32               ` Li Wang via ltp
2026-01-14 11:33                 ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-14 11:58                   ` Li Wang via ltp
2026-01-14 12:18                   ` Jan Stancek via ltp
2026-01-14 12:07             ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-01-14 12:47               ` Li Wang via ltp
2026-01-14 13:36                 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DFMMND84JK0B.27NIM2SX4YYGR@suse.com \
    --to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
    --cc=liwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=pradeep.susarla@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox