From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] configure.ac: fix mount_attr detection
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 12:28:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/yTyk9rYYsPJyVA@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230226192554.669332-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
Hi!
> Commit b857f8723f30a4b9554bf6b0ff8fa52fd07e8b60 tried to fix build with
> latest glibc which provides mount_attr in sys/mount.h. Unfortunately,
> the following build failure is still raised because sys/mount is now
> unconditionally included in include/lapi/fsmount.h:
>
> In file included from fsconfig01.c:9:
> ../../../../include/lapi/fsmount.h:55:8: error: redefinition of 'struct mount_attr'
> 55 | struct mount_attr {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from ../../../../include/lapi/fsmount.h:14:
> /home/autobuild/autobuild/instance-4/output-1/host/armeb-buildroot-linux-gnueabi/sysroot/usr/include/sys/mount.h:210:8: note: originally defined here
> 210 | struct mount_attr
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>
> Fixes:
> - http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/4dbb72e1bf081afd3cd944571b9beeefc7608865
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
> ---
> configure.ac | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index c2b0f48e7..a6d8ac826 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -225,10 +225,10 @@ AC_CHECK_TYPES([struct __kernel_old_timeval, struct __kernel_old_timespec, struc
>
> AC_CHECK_TYPES([struct futex_waitv],,,[#include <linux/futex.h>])
> AC_CHECK_TYPES([struct mount_attr],,,[
> -#ifdef HAVE_LINUX_MOUNT_H
> -# include <linux/mount.h>
> -#else
> +#ifdef HAVE_MOUNT_SETATTR
> # include <sys/mount.h>
> +#elif HAVE_LINUX_MOUNT_H
> +# include <linux/mount.h>
> #endif
> ])
I wonder if we can get this whole mess of two different fallback headers
simplified. Looking at the glibc implementation it seems to include
"linux/mount.h" if it does exist. So most reasonable solution would do
the same I guess which we did before the commit you reference.
@Li Wang where does the the sys/mount.h and linux/mount.h conflict? As
far as I can tell the UAPI linux/mount.h never defined any functions,
just constants, which should be solvable without the complex ifdefs, we
just need to check for existence of the types and define them only if
missing.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-27 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-26 19:25 [LTP] [PATCH] configure.ac: fix mount_attr detection Fabrice Fontaine
2023-02-27 11:28 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2023-03-09 10:56 ` Petr Vorel
2023-03-09 13:09 ` Li Wang
2023-03-09 13:00 ` Li Wang
2023-03-10 6:25 ` Li Wang
2023-03-10 9:31 ` Petr Vorel
2023-03-10 9:42 ` Li Wang
2023-03-10 11:42 ` Petr Vorel
2023-03-20 14:59 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/yTyk9rYYsPJyVA@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox