From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>,
Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>,
ltp@lists.linux.it, Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] fsconfig: New case cover CVE-2022-0185
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 15:35:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+UEqNtUTNaGVwXT@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y+UAENJVDUSDPAay@pevik>
Hi Wei,
...
> > +static void cleanup(void)
> > +{
> > + if (fd != -1)
> > + SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void run(void)
> > +{
> > + char *val = "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA";
> > +
> > + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 5000; i++)
> > + TEST(fsconfig(fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "\x00", val, 0));
TEST() itself does nothing.
> > +
> > + tst_res(TPASS | TTERRNO, "Try fsconfig overflow on %s done! Failed as expected", tst_device->fs_type);
TTERRNO should not be used with TPASS, TPASS does not analyze anything.
I guess something like this should be used:
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 5000; i++) {
TST_EXP_FAIL_SILENT(fsconfig(fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "\x00", val, 0),
EINVAL);
if (!TST_PASS)
return;
}
tst_res(TPASS, "fsconfig() overflow on %s haven't triggerred crash",
tst_device->fs_type);
but that fails on Btrfs.
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct tst_test test = {
> > + .test_all = run,
> > + .setup = setup,
> > + .cleanup = cleanup,
> > + .needs_root = 1,
> > + .format_device = 1,
> > + .mntpoint = MNTPOINT,
> > + .all_filesystems = 1,
> > + .min_kver = "5.17",
> You probably add it because 722d94847de29 comes from 5.17-rc1, but that should
> go away, because this fix has been backported to (at least) sles kernels (which
> are older).
> > + .tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
> > + {"linux-git", "722d94847de29"},
> > + {"CVE", "2020-29373"},
> IMHO CVE-2020-29373 is about io_uring
> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-29373
> Does it really belong to this test? If yes, it has another kernel fix.
> And you don't mention it in docparse description.
> > + {"CVE", "2022-0185"},
> > + {}
> > + }
Results on my machine (6.2.0-rc6)
tst_test.c:1634: TINFO: === Testing on ext2 ===
tst_test.c:1093: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext2 opts='' extra opts=''
mke2fs 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021)
note ext2 is *not* using new mount API
fsconfig03.c:50: TPASS: fsconfig() overflow on ext2 haven't triggerred crash
tst_test.c:1634: TINFO: === Testing on ext3 ===
tst_test.c:1093: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext3 opts='' extra opts=''
mke2fs 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021)
fsconfig03.c:50: TPASS: fsconfig() overflow on ext3 haven't triggerred crash
tst_test.c:1634: TINFO: === Testing on ext4 ===
tst_test.c:1093: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext4 opts='' extra opts=''
mke2fs 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021)
fsconfig03.c:50: TPASS: fsconfig() overflow on ext4 haven't triggerred crash
tst_test.c:1634: TINFO: === Testing on xfs ===
tst_test.c:1093: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with xfs opts='' extra opts=''
fsconfig03.c:50: TPASS: fsconfig() overflow on xfs haven't triggerred crash
tst_test.c:1634: TINFO: === Testing on btrfs ===
tst_test.c:1093: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with btrfs opts='' extra opts=''
fsconfig03.c:44: TFAIL: fsconfig(fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "\x00", val, 0) succeeded
Btrfs should be investigated (IMHO btrfs is using new mount API).
tst_test.c:1634: TINFO: === Testing on vfat ===
tst_test.c:1093: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra opts=''
fsconfig03.c:44: TFAIL: fsconfig(fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "\x00", val, 0) succeeded
tst_test.c:1634: TINFO: === Testing on exfat ===
tst_test.c:1093: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with exfat opts='' extra opts=''
fsconfig03.c:50: TPASS: fsconfig() overflow on exfat haven't triggerred crash
Interesting, exfat works :) It also uses new mount API.
tst_test.c:1634: TINFO: === Testing on ntfs ===
tst_test.c:1093: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ntfs opts='' extra opts=''
The partition start sector was not specified for /dev/loop0 and it could not be obtained automatically. It has been set to 0.
The number of sectors per track was not specified for /dev/loop0 and it could not be obtained automatically. It has been set to 0.
The number of heads was not specified for /dev/loop0 and it could not be obtained automatically. It has been set to 0.
To boot from a device, Windows needs the 'partition start sector', the 'sectors per track' and the 'number of heads' to be set.
Windows will not be able to boot from this device.
fsconfig03.c:29: TBROK: fsopen() failed: ENODEV (19)
Hm, that's strange
Due above, I suggest this:
.skip_filesystems = (const char *const []){"ntfs", "vfat", NULL},
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-09 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-29 11:50 [LTP] [PATCH v1] fsconfig: New case cover CVE-2022-0185 Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-01 12:49 ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-06 10:38 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-06 16:19 ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-08 9:01 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-08 15:48 ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-09 2:25 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-09 10:10 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-02-09 11:37 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-06 16:42 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-09 13:19 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-09 14:15 ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-09 14:27 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-02-09 14:40 ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-09 14:53 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-02-09 14:35 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2023-02-09 14:52 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-02-09 15:18 ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-10 8:22 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-10 9:00 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-13 1:09 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3] fsconfig03: New test CVE-2022-0185 Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-14 11:05 ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-02-16 9:42 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-16 12:09 ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-02-16 12:54 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-16 23:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-17 7:48 ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-17 8:47 ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-17 9:19 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-27 16:20 ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-02-28 3:22 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-28 3:27 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-28 8:49 ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-03-01 13:46 ` Martin Doucha
2023-03-01 14:12 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-02 1:45 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7] fsconfig03: SKIP check return value for old kernel Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-02 10:00 ` Petr Vorel
2023-03-02 10:45 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-02 10:03 ` Petr Vorel
2023-03-04 2:03 ` [LTP] [PATCH v8] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-07 9:23 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+UEqNtUTNaGVwXT@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=rpalethorpe@suse.com \
--cc=wegao@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox