From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24E5CC61DA4 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050373CBF9D for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:18:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A06483CB0B8 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:18:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from Atcsqr.andestech.com (60-248-80-70.hinet-ip.hinet.net [60.248.80.70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0CDC10009D0 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:17:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.andestech.com (ATCPCS16.andestech.com [10.0.1.222]) by Atcsqr.andestech.com with ESMTP id 31EEHqZs026951; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:17:52 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from ycliang@andestech.com) Received: from ubuntu01 (10.0.12.75) by ATCPCS16.andestech.com (10.0.1.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:17:51 +0800 Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:17:38 +0000 From: Leo Liang To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: References: <20230214122509.2957225-1-ycliang@andestech.com> <20230214122509.2957225-2-ycliang@andestech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.5 (2021-01-21) X-Originating-IP: [10.0.12.75] X-DNSRBL: X-MAIL: Atcsqr.andestech.com 31EEHqZs026951 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [v2 2/2] lib/tst_pid.c: Increase PIDS_RESERVED to avoid fork failure. X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Cyril, On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 02:43:35PM +0100, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > Hi! > > > After Adjusting how we count used pid, we increase > > > the number of PIDS_RESERVED to void fork failure. > > nit: in this case I'd actually keep changes in single commit > > (otherwise first commit alone would break tests), > > Do we get a different result from ps and parsing /proc? That sounds > strange... I think that's because "ps -eT" would list threads with the same PID but with different SPID. I get the following output on my VM. ycliang@ubuntu01:~$ ps -eT | wc -l 170 ycliang@ubuntu01:~$ ls -d /proc/[0-9]* | xargs -n1 | wc -l 127 Best regards, Leo > > -- > Cyril Hrubis > chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp