public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@sony.com>
Cc: "ltp@lists.linux.it" <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] lib: Add checking of needs_root
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:13:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0cRvJysXOJcabNL@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR13MB2503DBBBDBB055C42B36DDB0FD229@BYAPR13MB2503.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>



> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ltp <ltp-bounces+tim.bird=sony.com@lists.linux.it> On Behalf Of Petr Vorel

> > Hi all,

> > The subject "lib: Add checking of needs_root" is a bit misleading
> > as it does not mention at all that it's for the loop device.

> > > We need to check needs_root is set when tst_test->needs_device or
> > > tst_test->mount_device is set since access the /dev/* need a
> > > privilege.

> > FYI we had some discussion about it, quoting Cyril [1]:

> > 	Well technically you can be added into whatever group is set to
> > 	/dev/loop-control e.g. disk group and then you can create devices
> > 	without a need to be a root.

> > 	So the most correct solution would be checking if we can access
> > 	/dev/loop-control if tst_test.needs_device is set and if not we would
> > 	imply needs_root. However this would need to be rethinked properly so
> > 	that we do not end up creating something complex and not really
> > 	required.

> > There is also possibility to add custom device via $LTP_DEV. That might allow to
> > add permissions which allow to test without root.

> > I'll write to automated-testing ML (and maybe to LKML ML) to see if people
> > prefers to test without non-root.

> I took a quick look at this, and don't like the change.

> I didn't investigate all the affected tests, and what device exactly is being protected.
> But the overall sense of the change takes makes the authorization checking for tests
> less granular.

> Fuego often runs tests as 'root', but it is also fairly common in Fuego to have a
> dedicated testing user account on a device under test, that has permissions
> for things like mounting, access to device nodes, etc.  This change
> would cause tests to break for that account.

Hi Tim,

thanks a lot for confirming that people are using non-root users for testing.
I'm not sure if we ever implement complex checks, but at least we should not
merge this patchset.

Kind regards,
Petr

> That's my 2 cents.
>  -- Tim


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-12 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-12  9:15 [LTP] [PATCH 0/2] Optimization reference to needs_root Zhao Gongyi via ltp
2022-10-12  9:15 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] lib: Add checking of needs_root Zhao Gongyi via ltp
2022-10-12 11:33   ` Petr Vorel
2022-10-12 18:47     ` Bird, Tim
2022-10-12 19:13       ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2022-10-12  9:15 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] needs_root: Add setting " Zhao Gongyi via ltp
2022-10-13  7:41   ` Petr Vorel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-13  2:32 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] lib: Add checking " zhaogongyi via ltp
2022-10-13  7:38 ` Petr Vorel
2022-10-13  7:52 zhaogongyi via ltp
2022-10-13  9:11 ` Petr Vorel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y0cRvJysXOJcabNL@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox