From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED907C433FE for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2FD3CD21C for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:48:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BEC83C0796 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:48:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DCF9200759 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:48:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 334C61FE62; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:48:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1668422922; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R3XXGMQal2TweUmgl3Py34vOpouSJrqVvm6VljZDOJ0=; b=j6eAHfMkwqzsQzRTpxKADPhWkk3VoVaNrKaPe2Xm0FAgS3tR7C2pAhxCpHUyaNTyFiiND1 y2ULCIkLgKE8cT4BajUAwWYTetAIOAHvPzrI+EMgmMaUEofQdlhELoxT9YF6Tb3GfsKtYz 8lsoiz+yQPQ65eow6plErO3QfIW5FCg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1668422922; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R3XXGMQal2TweUmgl3Py34vOpouSJrqVvm6VljZDOJ0=; b=T5J6FNxFBiqKhf6JdSSa5OCW+0shiw86B08oVzNyQqCHDqliYDdbPtFz3qJTf6B5TiYH8t aHIIzwsE4Iu9kjBg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 229C113A8C; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id R78YBwodcmNRZgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:48:42 +0000 Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:50:05 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20221027215808.4126148-1-edliaw@google.com> <20221027215808.4126148-2-edliaw@google.com> <8735atww9l.fsf@suse.de> <87y1slvgkm.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v7 1/1] mmapstress01: refactor to tst_test framework X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kernel-team@android.com, ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > @Metan: I wonder if this can be fixed in docparser. For the time being I would rather keep the structures inline in the tst_test. Fixing this in the dumb parser would be doable, but quite an effort. We would have to start tracking global variables the same way we track macros. > @Richie: If not, it would be nice to have check for it (I'll add issue with > "check" label). And rewrite to any other system would be even bigger effort. Sounds like a hackweek project if anyone is interested. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp