Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/3] fanotify10: Add support for multiple event files

[Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>]

Hi Jan, all,

> On Thu 17-11-22 16:58:50, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Jan, all,

> > > +#define foreach_path(tc, buf, pname) \
> > > +	for (int piter = 0; format_path_check((buf), (tc)->pname##_fmt,	\
> > Unfortunately we still support C99 due old compiler on CentOS 7,
> > therefore int piter needs to be defined outside of for loop.

> Hum, but variable declaration in the for loop is part of C99 standard (as
> the error message also says). So did you want to say you are compiling
> against C89 standard? And CentOS 7 ships with GCC 4.8.5 AFAICS which should
> be fully C99 compliant BTW. So what's the situation here?
I'm sorry, I didn't express clearly myself. Yes, 4.8.5 supports C99,
but the default is C90 [1].

> That being said I can workaround the problem in the macro, it will just be
> somewhat uglier. So before doing that I'd like to understand whether
> following C89 is really required...

I'm don't remember why we have just not specified -std=... already, Cyril had
some objections, thus Cc him.

Cent0S EOL in 2024-06, we might reconsider to add -std=... to endup this agony
(errors like this often need to be fixed).

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.5/gcc/Standards.html

Kind regards,
Petr

> 								Honza

> > fanotify10.c:470:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
> >   for (int piter = 0; format_path_check((buf), (tc)->pname##_fmt, \
> >   ^

> > fanotify10.c:470:11: error: redefinition of ‘piter’
> >   for (int piter = 0; format_path_check((buf), (tc)->pname##_fmt, \
> >            ^
> > Kind regards,
> > Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp