From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E9BFC4332F for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B6E3CC880 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 11:39:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8A5C3C67D6 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 11:39:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96DF5140111C for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 11:39:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0A5D1F390; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:39:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1669372787; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/6DozReoyHSS7nwRAKp33NmwNecl8w5TsirixcMU89U=; b=2r3tZJB4AjKLDKjL0TTKoXYdVVhwCWlBNuPPNnqGEIZZQA7rMGKjwAxt7kMyzXdHHaquAv KGxe1qF3I+uwBfa2U3TFTzfsIhDdp7RIKDIVdC6RzxjykZwaHXv0RWo91Y+x++MXnUZaht Ky2sFlsSF1UEQv/7mwQSHjdTZg7tAnY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1669372787; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/6DozReoyHSS7nwRAKp33NmwNecl8w5TsirixcMU89U=; b=Ez/AmcwNhYhRLr9lfiDmH18wUyRX2DAztPg3thttJHqPDIf/1BS3ZVHz5TH4mhWmWsEtQA zv9SfN1XhNAeNaDQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6C9013A08; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id P61GK3ObgGPccAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:39:47 +0000 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 11:39:45 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: David Hildenbrand Message-ID: References: <20221123103547.54246-1-david@redhat.com> <8587b908-a035-a96a-7233-2863b7bc30ca@suse.cz> <79125e1d-760f-432f-1814-502521347680@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79125e1d-760f-432f-1814-502521347680@redhat.com> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] security/dirtyc0w_shmem: Add new test for CVE-2022-2590 X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > On 25.11.22 11:25, Martin Doucha wrote: > > On 25. 11. 22 11:20, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > See my other mail, it's the case on all instances that pass NULL (and I > > > don't really see the need to do this when working with NULL. > > NULL may be defined as simple integer 0. When int is 32bit and pointers > > 64bit, this will cause trouble in variadic functions such as execlp(). > > You do not need to remind us that LTP tests have lots of bugs, we know. > I can send a fixup patch for all these instances. Thank you! Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp