From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D3D5C4321E for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 13:08:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D063CC5A1 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:08:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB4463C714A for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:08:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19383600680 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:08:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 037D01F6E6; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 13:08:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1669727311; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HlQX8kvcMplyMEOaGhjffZx6fTZp8OTq3CAX3tp6H0s=; b=gYE71TA+Ti57UclWTMXCCm5UOMpPz5b1EZNSo73vY6dEtkTWVfChaCFgRsiscBrpIOTD7j sbL0AhydI0w1iyYeUFV1kvTvkhydMi9/VeZ5xojVRBoSlix9yim6cmoSBZWMmvoh0D4Xdp OmtknEb46QXoSWarplckM9Mw7W6sMIs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1669727311; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HlQX8kvcMplyMEOaGhjffZx6fTZp8OTq3CAX3tp6H0s=; b=bYhRReAqez+9UlLCnS5KsKRoJIIy84NOTmH90I9Qd9w36vJKPIc127vNrxujwqds1x+kAl bQkiFNLO34klP0Bg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E16E713AF6; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 13:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id YpqhNE4EhmP2JAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 13:08:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:09:50 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20221128091508.75414-1-teo.coupriediaz@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/1] brk: use direct syscalls X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > void verify_brk(void) > { > if (tst_variant) { > tst_res(TINFO, "Testing sbrk()"); > cur_brk = (uintptr_t)sbrk(0); > } else { > tst_res(TINFO, "Testing __NR_brk"); > cur_brk = (void *)tst_syscall(__NR_brk, 0); > } > > } > > struct tst_test test = { > ... > #ifdef __GLIBC__ > .test_variants = 2, > #else > .test_variants = 1, > #endif > ... > > Not sure if it should be testeed also on android, i.e: > #if defined(__GLIBC__) || defined(__ANDROID__) Can we rather than ifdefing things out check the actual return values? Should be as easy as doing: if (cur_brk == (void*)-1) tst_brk(TCONF, "sbrk() not implemented"); in the libc test variant. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp