From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
Cc: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>, ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] statvfs01: Convert to new LTP API
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:52:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4cZxK/SqTtpQb07@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221130070500.28664-1-akumar@suse.de>
Hi Avinesh,
> Removed the TINFO statements,
> Added a validation of statvfs.f_namemax field by trying to create
> files of valid and invalid length names.
Very nice rewrite, thanks for adding this veryfication.
It'd be nice to update this in docparse description.
> +
> +/*\
> + * [Description]
> + *
> + * Verify that statvfs() executes successfully for all
> + * available filesystems.
e.g.:
Verify that statvfs() executes successfully for all
available filesystems. Verify statvfs.f_namemax field
by trying to create files of valid and invalid length names.
I can merge it with this change.
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
...
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .test_all = run,
> + .setup = setup,
> + .needs_root = 1,
> + .mount_device = 1,
> + .mntpoint = MNT_POINT,
> + .all_filesystems = 1,
> + .skip_filesystems = (const char *const[]) {
> + "vfat",
> + "exfat",
I was looking what's wrong with vfat and exfat.
statvfs.f_namemax returns 1530, which is obviously too long, thus valid_fname
obviously returns ENAMETOOLONG (36). Tested on 6.1.0-rc6-1.g4c01546-default.
I wonder why, isn't that a bug?
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-30 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-24 11:42 [LTP] [PATCH] statvfs01: Convert to new LTP API Avinesh Kumar
2022-11-25 2:18 ` Li Wang
2022-11-29 10:58 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-11-30 7:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Avinesh Kumar
2022-11-30 8:52 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2022-11-30 9:50 ` Petr Vorel
2022-12-01 5:16 ` Li Wang
2022-12-01 9:34 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-02 9:20 ` Petr Vorel
2022-12-01 8:51 ` Avinesh Kumar
2022-12-01 9:17 ` Li Wang
2022-12-01 10:45 ` Petr Vorel
2022-12-01 11:04 ` Avinesh Kumar
2022-11-30 7:20 ` [LTP] [PATCH] " Li Wang
2022-12-01 6:00 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y4cZxK/SqTtpQb07@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=akumar@suse.de \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=rpalethorpe@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox