public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] fill_fs: Ensure written data is not easily compressed
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 16:28:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5NUBXVhtfSzgtHa@rei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o7seqlry.fsf@suse.de>

Hi!
> > The test is supposed to test what happens when filesystem is altmost
> > full and being written to, which may trigger all kinds of corner cases.
> > In that sense it makes sense to randomize the access patterns a bit so
> > that we have higher chances of utilizing different code paths. But of
> > course the question where should we stop in randomizing things and what
> > makes sense and what does not.
> 
> I think there are multiple scenarious which are totally different.
> 
> For example, Redis uses an append only file (AOF) and IIRC you can
> choose to batch writes for performance at the expense of data
> integrity. It's common for the AOF to have it's own volume.
> 
> OTOH if we have a classic server with 1000s of daemons running, then we
> can expect writes to happen in parallel and be random.
> 
> I'd be in favor of trying to test these things separately and to keep
> each scenario as simple (and reproducible) as possible. I think mixing
> together different access patterns is better handled by fuzzing.

I suppose.

Or we can run the test a few times with different access patters and do
not mix them in a single run.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-09 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-06 11:53 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] fs_fill: Add max_runtime = 60 Richard Palethorpe via ltp
2022-12-06 11:53 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] fill_fs: Ensure written data is not easily compressed Richard Palethorpe via ltp
2022-12-06 13:33   ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-12-06 15:22     ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-06 16:15       ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-12-06 16:30         ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-06 18:02           ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-12-08  8:57             ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-09 15:28               ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2022-12-06 15:33 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] fs_fill: Add max_runtime = 60 Petr Vorel
2022-12-08  2:39   ` Li Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y5NUBXVhtfSzgtHa@rei \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=rpalethorpe@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox