From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9E0C54EAA for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 23:01:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDE03CD36D for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:01:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 401C73CB5BD for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:00:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C08471000C13 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:00:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 814901F8A8; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 23:00:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1674774046; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=P7EXtEgYOQI23G3BOCqpnOex0tLhMePgQZIqp60h6X8=; b=ZlCF3l7otx9axGPf0ecHD+A+GJzWWxDIJktbDBqnxuRvYfMh6KerjmBrjhgJvIsdixb29F ku4SatW6CusFk5TeBih0dIo7G+w+iMhy2cXg9VcNVeFBQcVc3I6yvrjFE1pYcb5RfOcgip z4CkXso1ovoc60PZLjuWU2x5j+ZGGxM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1674774046; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=P7EXtEgYOQI23G3BOCqpnOex0tLhMePgQZIqp60h6X8=; b=Akjei4kyz7byoemvOP7F5KagVBoUdVOVRoKieiniAGqF++GuCqYdSq3GN+4CkSHPPSuixC kw6DKwC08545RMAA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 459B813A09; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 23:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id puXvDR4G02MIAgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 23:00:46 +0000 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:00:44 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Tarun Sahu Message-ID: References: <20230125222703.19943-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20230125222703.19943-2-pvorel@suse.cz> <87edrh0zy2.fsf@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87edrh0zy2.fsf@linux.ibm.com> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] hugemmap15: Compile with -O X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Richard Palethorpe , ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Tarun, > Hi Petr, Cyril, all > Though It already got merged, please note this, FYI this has not been merged (only the second patch "hugemmap15: Use TST_TEST_TCONF() for unsupported archs", which was needed to fix compilations). > IIRC, I specifically turned off optimization for hugemmap15 > because of clang compiler issue, it behaves weirdly with clang > without -O0 and test fails on the system. Isn't -O the same as -O0 ? Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp