From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:13:55 +0100
Subject: [LTP] ??????: [PATCH v2] cleanup: Unify the annotation style
 and remove Redundant code
In-Reply-To: <YFHxcgN/3TG2Y9Mx@yuki.lan>
References: <20210317100154.20389-1-zhaogongyi@huawei.com>
 <YFHghQWbAmjmKDx3@pevik>
 <OS0PR01MB6371A1E607BDFBC2421E6788836A9@OS0PR01MB6371.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
 <YFHpSspnD52A8N0P@pevik> <YFHxcgN/3TG2Y9Mx@yuki.lan>
Message-ID: <YFHyg8m3CmU8as2C@pevik>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

Hi,

> Hi!
> > I'd keep both: this is for cleanup of old approach, conversion in testinfo.pl in
> > case there is inconsistency in the future.

> If we agree on a certain format I would vote for docparse to fail the
> build if the format is wrong, that will force us to maintain the
> metadata correctly.
Make sense. But being the one who often fixes docparse failures I'm not sure if
I want to implement extra work for myself :).

(It'd help to implement https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/599,
but I don't have any server to run it).

Kind regards,
Petr