[LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] doc: Add Maintainer Patch Review Checklist

[Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>]

> Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com> wrote:


> > +Commit messages should have
> >> +
> >> +* Author's `Signed-off-by` tag
> >> +* Committer's `Reviewed-by` or `Signed-off-by` tag


> > Or adding `Acked-by:` also acceptable?

> > I'm not sure what's the difference between Acked-by and Reviewed-by,
> > but personally feel the Acked-by has more confidence in the reviewing.

> > In my mind,

> > `Acked-by` means:
> > code review OK, compiled OK, executed OK, has confidence it OK for all
> > arches

> > `Reviewed-by` means:
> > code review OK, compiled and executed OK just locally or optional, still room
> > for improvement/discussion


> Plz ignore my rough understanding, I find a precise description at kernel
> process/submitting-patches.rst.

> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by

But you were right, I omit "tags". Maybe this?

- Check also mailing lists for other reviewers / testers
+ Check also mailing lists for other reviewers / testers tags, notes and failure reports

Kind regards,
Petr