From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 21:13:34 +0100
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 0/8] fanotify tests for v5.13
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxhLOqfarhXa-mnPnUtSXVUr1cpz79bm3TE6c5=4oo-Eeg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20210318131134.3562203-1-amir73il@gmail.com>
 <YFShR2Qd7Ubve1wi@pevik>
 <CAOQ4uxhLOqfarhXa-mnPnUtSXVUr1cpz79bm3TE6c5=4oo-Eeg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <YFeo7vI58VMA6W7a@pevik>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

Hi Amir,

> Whatever you think is best for your project users.
> If you want to document the commits that added the features, I suggest
> that you wait until those commits hit master (next cycle).
> These are the relevant commit subjects:

>    fanotify: configurable limits via sysfs
>    fanotify: support limited functionality for unprivileged users

Thanks a lot!
IMHO being in next tree should be ok (commits hashes should be kept).

FYI next week I'm busy due hackweek, thus I'll probably merge this after.

Kind regards,
Petr

[1] http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2021-March/021637.html