From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Vorel Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:36:41 +0100 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 0/8] fanotify tests for v5.13 In-Reply-To: References: <20210318131134.3562203-1-amir73il@gmail.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi Amir, > > > Whatever you think is best for your project users. > > > If you want to document the commits that added the features, I suggest > > > that you wait until those commits hit master (next cycle). > > > These are the relevant commit subjects: > > > fanotify: configurable limits via sysfs > > > fanotify: support limited functionality for unprivileged users > > Thanks a lot! > > IMHO being in next tree should be ok (commits hashes should be kept). > There is no such guarantee, certainly not so far from the v5.13 merge > window, so I advise against including the commit ids at this point. > The commit subject is descriptive enough IMO and you can add commit > ids later on if you think it is necessary. Merged + updated doc formatting for our doc generation. Thanks for your work! Kind regards, Petr