From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Vorel Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 21:14:59 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] Ignore ntfs file system In-Reply-To: <53b80b9e-42f6-90f7-1199-3592b4e5fcaa@uniontech.com> References: <20210425030440.12762-1-zhanglianjie@uniontech.com> <726f49eb-a185-6637-44e3-232d5e9b6fab@uniontech.com> <53b80b9e-42f6-90f7-1199-3592b4e5fcaa@uniontech.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi, > > > > Shouldn't "ntfs" *replace* "fuse"? > > > Can't replace fuse. > > Not sure if we understand each other: I mean add "ntfs" and *remove* "fuse", > > as "fuse" is now redundant when we whitelist ntfs (see > > tst_get_supported_fs_types()), unless there is problem with other fuse > > filesystems. I tested with CONFIG_FUSE_FS=m CONFIG_EXFAT_FS=m. > > But maybe removing "fuse" should be a separate step. > I can understand what you mean, but I can't remove the fuse. If the fuse is > removed and the kernel is not configured with CONFIG_EXFAT_FS=m, it will > cause the test exfat to fail. You're right, I didn't notice I tested it without mount.exfat. Sorry for being slow. Interesting that while NTFS kernel module does not work on the test, exfat from Samsung does. Anyway merged. Thanks! Kind regards, Petr