From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 11:14:45 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Libclang based analyzer In-Reply-To: <85bddc61-f6dc-de7c-3a62-daeefcd0a058@jv-coder.de> References: <20210604111434.21422-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com> <85bddc61-f6dc-de7c-3a62-daeefcd0a058@jv-coder.de> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! > So in conclusion, I do not think we can assume libclang to be available > for all developers and installing it is probably more work, at least > when newer functions from libclang are used, than installing coccinelle. > And very important for final setup: It must be possible to successfully > compile ltp, without libclang/coccinelle available. There is no reason > to force this libraries/tools for pure "users" of ltp. Indeed this is supposed to be tooling for developers and strictly optional. If this breaks builds without libclang it has to be fixed. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz