From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Vorel Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 13:51:12 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] sendfile0{2,9}: Remove OFF_T workaround In-Reply-To: References: <20210526104633.29561-1-pvorel@suse.cz> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi Cyril, > Hi Cyril, > > Hi! > > > Using OFF_T definition to off64_t for 64bit variants seems to be am old > > > workaround for buggy libc. Nowadays we can rely on off_t to have correct size > > > (i.e.: 32bit: 4 bytes; 64bit or 32bit with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64: 8 bytes) > > Looks good to me, Reviewed-by: Cyril Hrubis > > > Suggested-by: Cyril Hrubis > > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel > > > --- > > > NOTE: -DOFF_T=off64_t is also defined in testcases/kernel/io/disktest > > > and mentioned in {tst_,}safe_macros.h. > > We should remove the -DOFF_T=off64_t comment from the *safe_macros.h and > > keep only the _FILE_OFFSET_BITS there. > Good. OK, after I solve our CI (github actions) I'll merge this and send another > patch which removes it in testcases/kernel/io/disktest + the comment in > *safe_macros.h. Merged with your reviewed-by tag and going to implement above in separate patch. Kind regards, Petr > Thanks for review and hints! > Kind regards, > Petr