public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Libclang based analyzer
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 14:52:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLoiF6Wy6cALM0Yy@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210604111434.21422-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com>

Hi!
> Compared to the Coccinelle version it's very ugly. However I think
> this will allow us to get all the low hanging fruit without creating
> major problems for test developers.

I had a look at the code and it does not seem to be that bad. It's
longer due to some boiler plate and more explicit but not necessarily
ugly.

> I guess it could be run during CI if we either fix all the existing
> TEST() usages in the library or add an ignore list. I already have a
> Coccinelle script to help with the former.

I will have a look at the patches generated by coccinelle, I supposed
that we want to merge them regardless.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-04 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-04 11:14 [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Libclang based analyzer Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-04 11:14 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] Add 'make check' and clang-check to build system Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-04 14:10   ` Petr Vorel
2021-06-04 14:11     ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-06-04 14:28     ` Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-04 14:33       ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-06-07  9:18   ` Joerg Vehlow
2021-06-07  9:12     ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-06-11 13:49   ` Petr Vorel
2021-06-11 14:17     ` Petr Vorel
2021-06-14 11:09       ` Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-04 11:14 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] Start libclang based analyzer and TEST() check Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-04 12:52 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2021-06-04 13:50   ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Libclang based analyzer Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-07  8:37 ` Joerg Vehlow
2021-06-07  9:14   ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-06-07 10:20   ` Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-07 11:34     ` Joerg Vehlow
2021-06-07 13:42       ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-06-07 13:49       ` Richard Palethorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YLoiF6Wy6cALM0Yy@yuki \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox