From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v4 3/3] API: Remove TST_ERR usage from rtnetlink/netdevice
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 16:14:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNHwNTJQ2zVu5rNJ@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3dfda1bd-3829-7188-6add-e1755e91df4f@suse.cz>
Hi!
> >>> The test author is guaranteed that the library will not set TST_ERR
> >>> except via the TEST macro and similar.
> >>
> >> Hi, who decided to guarantee this and where is the guarantee documented?
>
> Guaranteeing that TST_RET and TST_ERR will not be modified makes sense
> for SAFE_SYSCALL()s because they will be used extensively throughout
> test code. But the case is not so clear for primarily setup()/cleanup()
> functions like the af_alg, rtnetlink and netdevice libraries. And note
> that the rtnetlink library allows you to check ACKs manually without
> calling the two functions which will modify TST_ERR.
>
> So again, where is the extent of this guarantee documented? I haven't
> found any mention of it in the doc/ dir and Richie didn't add any docs
> changes in his patchset either. Documenting this is necessary for both
> test writers and library maintainers.
I guess that it should be added to
doc/library-api-writing-guidelines.txt but that is orthogonal to the
attempt to fix the the library code itself.
> >> Changing the return value to always return errno will be a major PITA
> >> because 95% of error handling happens after some safe_syscall() which
> >> clobbers errno by calling tst_brk() after failure. And if you only want
> >> to return error codes from rtnetlink ACK messages, then there's the
> >> problem what to return when a safe_syscall() fails during cleanup().
> >
> > For the current code it would be as easy as:
>
> That code will only result in RTNL_SEND_VALIDATE() always returning 0
> regardless of success or failure, except when tst_brk() terminates the
> whole program.
Ah right, we have to return non-zero if the tst_rtnl_send() or
tst_rtnl_rect() failed. I would be nice to propagete the errno properly,
which we do not do at the moment, but that looks like a lot of effort so
we may as well hardcode something non-zero there as well.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-22 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-15 7:40 [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/3] Add Coccinelle helper scripts for reference Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-15 7:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/3] API: Remove TEST macro usage from library Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-15 13:23 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-06-16 6:37 ` Li Wang
2021-06-17 7:45 ` Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-15 7:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 3/3] API: Remove TST_ERR usage from rtnetlink/netdevice Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-15 13:29 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-06-17 8:40 ` Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-22 13:49 ` Martin Doucha
2021-06-22 13:40 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-06-22 14:25 ` Martin Doucha
2021-06-22 14:14 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2021-06-23 10:24 ` Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-15 13:22 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/3] Add Coccinelle helper scripts for reference Cyril Hrubis
2021-06-16 7:24 ` Li Wang
2021-06-16 7:48 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YNHwNTJQ2zVu5rNJ@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox