From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] getrlimit/getrlimit03: fix unavailable __NR_getrlimit for arm
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 15:42:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNM6QGFYt/bpaPDS@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210623134041.366838-1-balsini@android.com>
Hi!
> __NR_getrlimit has been deprecated from arm EABI, and is only available
> if the OABI_COMPAT config option is defined.
> This causes failures with the current test as it assumes that
> __NR_getrlimit exists if __NR_ugetrlimit is defined, while this
> assumption does not hold anymore.
>
> Catch this exception by testing if __NR_getrlimit is defined and the
> target is arm.
I suppose that this a proper fix for:
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/819
> Signed-off-by: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrlimit/getrlimit03.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrlimit/getrlimit03.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrlimit/getrlimit03.c
> index 319bc494a..e46a25f7b 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrlimit/getrlimit03.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrlimit/getrlimit03.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,14 @@
> #define __NR_getrlimit_ulong_str "__NR_getrlimit"
> #endif
>
> +/**
> + * __NR_getrlimit has been deprecated from arm EABI and moved to OABI_COMPAT,
> + * so the syscall may or may not be available.
> + */
> +#if defined(__arm__) && __NR_getrlimit == __LTP__NR_INVALID_SYSCALL
> +#define DEPRECATED_GETRLIMIT
> +#endif
> +
> #ifndef HAVE_STRUCT_RLIMIT64
> struct rlimit64 {
> uint64_t rlim_cur;
> @@ -167,7 +175,7 @@ static void run(unsigned int resource)
> tst_res(TPASS, "__NR_prlimit64(%d) and %s(%d) gave consistent results",
> resource, __NR_getrlimit_ulong_str, resource);
>
> -#if SIGNED_GETRLIMIT
> +#if SIGNED_GETRLIMIT && !defined(DEPRECATED_GETRLIMIT)
> errno = 0;
> ret_l = getrlimit_long(resource, &rlim_l);
> errno_l = errno;
I guess that this generates a few unused function warnings, can we fix
all the places with #if SIGNED_GETRLIMIT in the source code please?
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-23 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-23 13:40 [LTP] [PATCH] getrlimit/getrlimit03: fix unavailable __NR_getrlimit for arm Alessio Balsini
2021-06-23 13:42 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2021-06-24 12:31 ` Alessio Balsini
2021-06-25 11:57 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YNM6QGFYt/bpaPDS@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox