From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Vorel Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 13:02:00 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] shmget03: fix test when some shm segments already exist In-Reply-To: <60E50AB4.7050404@fujitsu.com> References: <20210706105758.43220-1-aleksei.kodanev@bell-sw.com> <381b8420-3dba-d7c1-027c-e2e2adc719de@bell-sw.com> <60E50AB4.7050404@fujitsu.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi Xu, all, > Hi Li, Alexey > > Alexey Kodanev > > wrote: > > It's also possible that some resources will be freed during > > the tests... perhaps, moving the loop to verify_*() is the > > better option? > > Yes, good point, that would be more precise for ENOSPC testing. > AFAIK, ltp doesn't support parallel test now. I think parallel test > maybe a future plan that is why we use docparase to collect each case's > used resources(so we can convert many groups, like pid, memory, disk > space..., then we can run pid group and memory groups test case parallelly). Yes, parallel support is not supported atm. Richie and Cyril has done some work on runltp-ng to support it. Yes, first it's needed to add support in resources (docparse), see Cyril's old block post [1]. Kind regards, Petr [1] https://people.kernel.org/metan/towards-parallel-kernel-test-runs > This is my understanding. If wrong, please correct me. > Best Regards > Yang Xu > > -- > > Regards, > > Li Wang