From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] shmget03: fix test when some shm segments already exist
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:41:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YOwASqNKNXBl4lqe@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c81eee80-6cea-de14-aeff-8919495c4396@bell-sw.com>
> On 12.07.2021 05:31, xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > Hi All
> >> Hi!
> >>>>> Yes, good point, that would be more precise for ENOSPC testing.
> >>>> AFAIK, ltp doesn't support parallel test now. I think parallel test
> >>>> maybe a future plan that is why we use docparase to collect each case's
> >>>> used resources(so we can convert many groups, like pid, memory, disk
> >>>> space..., then we can run pid group and memory groups test case parallelly).
> >>> Yes, parallel support is not supported atm. Richie and Cyril has done some work
> >>> on runltp-ng to support it. Yes, first it's needed to add support in resources
> >>> (docparse), see Cyril's old block post [1].
> >> Besides most of the SHM tests will crash and burn if executed in
> >> parallel. The SysV IPC shares a global namespace and because of that we
> >> can't really write tests without assuming that we are the only one
> >> manipulating them when the test is executed.
> > I guess we should reach a consensus that how to fix this problem
> > 1)use for loop to trigger this error
> > 2)use CLONE_NEWIPC to trigger this error
> Perhaps it can be done at the higher level, e.g. in the ltp tests
> runner if some tests request it with a newipc flag...
Well, we have at least two runners (runltp which uses ltp-pan, runltp-ng) and we
also support running tests without runner, it'd be nice to solve this in LTP
API.
Kind regards,
Petr
> > 3)Or we are the only one that use shm and we can add a api to count the
> > existed_cnt
> > ps: I don't want to leave this problem too long time.
> > Best Regards
> > Yang Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-12 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-06 10:57 [LTP] [PATCH] shmget03: fix test when some shm segments already exist Alexey Kodanev
2021-07-06 12:49 ` Li Wang
2021-07-06 13:43 ` Alexey Kodanev
2021-07-06 14:18 ` Alexey Kodanev
2021-07-07 1:26 ` Li Wang
2021-07-07 1:59 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-07-07 14:12 ` Alexey Kodanev
2021-07-08 11:02 ` Petr Vorel
2021-07-08 12:02 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-07-12 2:31 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-07-12 7:46 ` Alexey Kodanev
2021-07-12 8:41 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2021-07-12 8:46 ` Alexey Kodanev
2021-07-14 9:33 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-07-14 10:00 ` Petr Vorel
2021-07-14 10:17 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-07-07 1:50 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-07-07 2:21 ` Li Wang
2021-07-07 4:30 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-07-08 2:24 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-07-08 8:27 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YOwASqNKNXBl4lqe@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox