From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] msgget03: don't depend on existed shared resources
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 14:11:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPqx7si/bvK3alWj@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YPlsVD2gbIiX8JJk@yuki>
Hi Cyril, all,
> Hi!
> > > I think that we allready discussed this in another thread:
> > > https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2021-July/023831.html
> > Thanks, I forgot this. In that case my approach (not using <=, but count
> > segments in /proc/sysvipc/shm before testing) might be more precise.
> > But no strong feeling about that, both solutions fix the test, let's chose one
> > and merge.
> As I said previously, there are many SysV IPC tests that do expect that
> nobody will add/remove IPC shm/queue/semaphores during the testrun and
> some of the testcases cannot even be implemented without this
> expectation.
> Hence I wouldn't complicate the test here and just count how many
> segments are there at the start and be done with it.
Yes, that's what's done in "my approach" [1].
Kind regards,
Petr
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20210722073523.5099-1-pvorel@suse.cz/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-23 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-12 7:52 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] shmget03: don't depend on existed shared resources Alexey Kodanev
2021-07-12 7:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] msgget03: " Alexey Kodanev
2021-07-22 7:55 ` Petr Vorel
2021-07-22 12:14 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-07-22 13:01 ` Petr Vorel
2021-07-22 13:02 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-07-23 8:46 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-07-23 12:24 ` Petr Vorel
2021-07-27 5:51 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-08-04 1:45 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-08-04 14:48 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-08-04 15:45 ` Petr Vorel
2021-08-05 3:43 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-08-05 6:36 ` Petr Vorel
2021-08-05 6:58 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-07-23 12:11 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2021-07-12 8:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] shmget03: " Li Wang
2021-07-12 8:37 ` Alexey Kodanev
2021-07-12 8:42 ` Li Wang
2021-07-12 8:55 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YPqx7si/bvK3alWj@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox