From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 07:58:07 +1000
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 3/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Validate incoming FID in
 FAN_FS_ERROR
In-Reply-To: <YR+CH2+GYzwU2/SG@pevik>
References: <20210802214645.2633028-1-krisman@collabora.com>
 <20210802214645.2633028-4-krisman@collabora.com>
 <CAOQ4uxjMfJM4FM4tWJWgjbK4a2K1hNJdEBRvwQTh9+5su2N0Tw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87fsvphksu.fsf@collabora.com>
 <CAOQ4uxj_WwDPxZv0nr9+Hh+pim6+2onaBdFq_BR-qK=xz+8yUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YR+CH2+GYzwU2/SG@pevik>
Message-ID: <YSAlb7XGUNoc73ZJ@google.com>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

Hey Gabriel,

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:21:19PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> > No problem. That's what review is for ;-)
> 
> > BTW, unless anyone is specifically interested I don't think there
> > is a reason to re post the test patches before the submission request.
> > Certainly not for the small fixes that I requested.
> 
> > I do request that you post a link to a branch with the fixed test
> > so that we can experiment with the kernel patches.
> 
> > I've also CC'ed Matthew who may want to help with review of the test
> > and man page that you posted in the cover letter [1].
> 
> @Amir Thanks a lot for your review, agree with all you mentioned.
> 
> @Gabriel Thanks for your contribution. I'd also consider squashing some of the
> commits.

Is the FAN_FS_ERROR feature to be included within the 5.15 release? If so,
I may need to do some shuffling around as these LTP tests collide with the
ones I author for the FAN_REPORT_PIDFD series.

/M