public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: zhanglianjie <zhanglianjie@uniontech.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/5] syscalls/clone02: Convert to new API
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 17:40:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWRa4VvL33YclVX3@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210923085224.868-1-zhanglianjie@uniontech.com>

Hi!
> -/*
> - * test_SIG() - This function changes the signal handler for SIGUSR2
> - *		signal for child. If CLONE_SIGHAND flag is set, this
> - *		affects parent also.
> - */
> -static int test_SIG(void)
> +static void verify_clone(void)
>  {
> +	TST_EXP_PID_SILENT(ltp_clone(tcases[tst_variant].flags, child_fn, NULL,
> +				CHILD_STACK_SIZE, child_stack));
> 
> -	struct sigaction new_act;
> +	if (!TST_PASS)
> +		return;
> 
> -	new_act.sa_handler = sig_child_defined_handler;
> -	new_act.sa_flags = SA_RESTART;
> -	sigemptyset(&new_act.sa_mask);
> -
> -	/* Set signal handler to sig_child_defined_handler */
> -	if (sigaction(SIGUSR2, &new_act, NULL) == -1) {
> -		tst_resm(TWARN | TERRNO, "signal failed in test_SIG");
> -		return -1;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* Send SIGUSR2 signal to parent */
> -	if (kill(getppid(), SIGUSR2) == -1) {
> -		tst_resm(TWARN | TERRNO, "kill failed in test_SIG");
> -		return -1;
> -	}
> +	tst_reap_children();
> 
> -	return 0;
> +	TST_EXP_PASS(tcases[tst_variant].parent_fn(), "%s", tcases[tst_variant].desc);

Can we, instead of this, print PASS/FAIL for each check we do, so that
if something fails the log explains what exactly has failed?

>  }
> 
> -/*
> - * modified_VM() - This function is called by parent process to check
> - *		   whether child's modification to parent_variable
> - *		   is visible to parent
> - */
> -
> -static int modified_VM(void)
> -{
> -
> -	if (parent_variable == CHILD_VALUE)
> -		/* child has modified parent_variable */
> -		return 1;
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> 
> -/*
> - * modified_FILES() - This function checks for file descriptor table
> - *		      modifications done by child
> - */
> -static int modified_FILES(void)
> +static void cleanup(void)
>  {
> -	char buff[20];
> +	SAFE_CHDIR(cwd_parent);
> +	SAFE_UNLINK(TESTFILE);
> +	SAFE_RMDIR(cwd_child);
> 
> -	if (((read(fd_parent, buff, sizeof(buff))) == -1) && (errno == EBADF))
> -		/* Child has closed this file descriptor */
> -		return 1;
> -
> -	/* close fd_parent */
> -	if ((close(fd_parent)) == -1)
> -		tst_resm(TWARN | TERRNO, "close() failed in modified_FILES()");
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	free(cwd_parent);
> +	free(child_stack);
>  }
> 
> -/*
> - * modified_FS() - This function checks parent's current working directory
> - *		   to see whether its modified by child or not.
> - */
> -static int modified_FS(void)
> +static void setup(void)
>  {
> -	char cwd[FILENAME_MAX];
> -
> -	if ((getcwd(cwd, sizeof(cwd))) == NULL)
> -		tst_resm(TWARN | TERRNO, "getcwd() failed");
> +	struct sigaction def_act;
> 
> -	if (!(strcmp(cwd, cwd_parent)))
> -		/* cwd hasn't changed */
> -		return 0;
> +	/* Save current working directory of parent */
> +	cwd_parent = tst_get_tmpdir();
> 
> -	return 1;
> -}
> +	/*
> +	 * Set value for parent_variable in parent, which will be
> +	 * changed by child for testing CLONE_VM flag
> +	 */
> +	parent_variable = PARENT_VALUE;
> 
> -/*
> - * modified_SIG() - This function checks whether child has changed
> - *		    parent's signal handler for signal, SIGUSR2
> - */
> -static int modified_SIG(void)
> -{
> +	/*
> +	 * Open file from parent, which will be closed by
> +	 * child, used for testing CLONE_FILES flag
> +	 */
> +	fd_parent = SAFE_OPEN(TESTFILE, O_CREAT | O_RDWR, 0777);
> 
> -	if (parent_got_signal)
> -		/*
> -		 * parent came through sig_child_defined_handler()
> -		 * this means child has changed parent's handler
> -		 */
> -		return 1;
> +	/*
> +	 * set parent_got_signal to 0, used for testing
> +	 * CLONE_SIGHAND flag
> +	 */
> +	parent_got_signal = 0;

We have to make sure we reset the $PWD, variable, got_signal flag and
open() the file before each test iteration otherwise the test will fail
on subsequent iterations with -i 2 command line parameter.

> -	return 0;
> -}
> +	def_act.sa_handler = sig_parent_default_handler;
> +	def_act.sa_flags = SA_RESTART;
> +	SAFE_SIGEMPTYSET(&def_act.sa_mask);
> +	SAFE_SIGACTION(SIGUSR2, &def_act, NULL);
> 
> -/*
> - * sig_child_defined_handler()  - Signal handler installed by child
> - */
> -static void sig_child_defined_handler(int pid)
> -{
> -	if ((syscall(__NR_gettid)) == child_pid)
> -		/* Child got signal, give warning */
> -		tst_resm(TWARN, "Child got SIGUSR2 signal");
> -	else
> -		parent_got_signal = TRUE;
> +	SAFE_MKDIR(TESTDIR, 0777);
> +	sprintf(cwd_child, "%s/%s", cwd_parent, TESTDIR);
> +	child_stack = SAFE_MALLOC(CHILD_STACK_SIZE);

Can we use the guarded buffer instead of MALLOC in this test as well?
Just as we do in clone01.c now.

>  }
> 
> -/* sig_default_handler() - Default handler for parent */
> -static void sig_default_handler(void)
> -{
> -}
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> +	.setup = setup,
> +	.cleanup = cleanup,
> +	.test_variants = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),

This should rather be .tcnt and .test = verify_clone instead of
variants.

Test variants are usually used when the whole test is exactly same but
the TEST_*() function calls different variant of the syscall instead.

> +	.test_all = verify_clone,
> +	.needs_tmpdir = 1,
> +};

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-11 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-23  8:52 [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/5] syscalls/clone02: Convert to new API zhanglianjie
2021-09-23  8:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/5] syscalls/clone03: " zhanglianjie
2021-09-24  9:19   ` Richard Palethorpe
2021-10-11 15:02     ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-09-23  8:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 3/5] syscalls/clone05: " zhanglianjie
2021-10-11 15:59   ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-09-23  8:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 4/5] syscalls/clone06: " zhanglianjie
2021-10-12  9:21   ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-10-13  2:49     ` zhanglianjie
2021-09-23  8:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 5/5] syscalls/clone07: " zhanglianjie
2021-10-12  9:37   ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-10-13  5:14     ` zhanglianjie
2021-10-13 10:00       ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-10-11 15:40 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2021-10-12  6:39   ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/5] syscalls/clone02: " zhanglianjie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YWRa4VvL33YclVX3@yuki \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=zhanglianjie@uniontech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox