From: Matthew Bobrowski via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] syscalls/fanotify21: add new test checking the returned pidfd from fanotify in FAN_REPORT_PIDFD mode
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 20:36:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYpBAlufyR0nlI7S@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxgphXO16-u2fsm9Ts4nxY3AzSPpyMbKMWb2AtWs2ASB7Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 06:21:56AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > +next_event:
> > + i += event->event_len;
> > + if (event->fd >= 0)
> > + SAFE_CLOSE(event->fd);
> > +
> > + if (info && info->pidfd >= 0)
> > + SAFE_CLOSE(info->pidfd);
> > +
> > + if (event_pidfd_fdinfo)
> > + free(event_pidfd_fdinfo);
>
> Need to reset event_pidfd_fdinfo = NULL
> to avoid double free in do_cleanup
But, the variable event_pidfd_fdinfo is not referenced nor is visible
outside the scope of the do_test() function and therefore no double
free would occur, right?
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void do_cleanup(void)
> > +{
> > + if (fanotify_fd >= 0)
> > + SAFE_CLOSE(fanotify_fd);
> > +
> > + if (self_pidfd_fdinfo)
> > + free(self_pidfd_fdinfo);
Variables self_pidfd_fdinfo do_cleanup() and event_pidfd_fdinfo
do_test() are different.
/M
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-09 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-02 10:57 [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/2] Test support for new fanotify FAN_REPORT_PIDFD feature Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-02 10:57 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] syscalls/fanotify20: add new test for FAN_REPORT_PIDFD Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-02 11:02 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-11-02 11:15 ` Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-02 12:15 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-11-05 3:03 ` Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-02 10:57 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] syscalls/fanotify21: add new test checking the returned pidfd from fanotify in FAN_REPORT_PIDFD mode Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-05 4:21 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-11-09 9:36 ` Matthew Bobrowski via ltp [this message]
2021-11-09 10:34 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YYpBAlufyR0nlI7S@google.com \
--to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=repnop@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox