public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] syscalls/fanotify: Add a helper macro which checks for the presence of specific fanotify initialization flag(s)
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:39:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZN8OLkeUUBP8yDK@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZMEMwvdpA/IXz+P@google.com>

Hi Matthew, Amir,

> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:20:18PM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Matthew, Amir,

> > Tested on two distro kernels with support (Tumbleweed and Debian unstable)
> > + on various old kernels without support.

> > Merged with very minor fixes, see diff below.

> Noted the changes, they're fine by me. Thanks for the merge!
+1

> > NOTE: we now support basic static analysis + checkpatch formatting check - run
> > make check in fanotify directory or make check-fanotify20.

> Oh, that's great, I had no idea. Quickly running it, looks like
> there's a bunch of clean up required for some of the older tests. Will
> have to get around to doing that at some point.

Thanks a lot, that's really appreciated.
Also, thanks a lot you and Amir for really maintaining fanotify tests.

Kind regards,
Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-16  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-09 10:04 [LTP] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add test support for the new fanotify FAN_REPORT_PIDFD feature Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-09 10:04 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] syscalls/fanotify: Add a helper macro which checks for the presence of specific fanotify initialization flag(s) Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-09 11:05   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-11-15 21:20     ` Petr Vorel
2021-11-16  1:06       ` Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-16  9:39         ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2021-11-09 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/3] syscalls/fanotify20: add new test for FAN_REPORT_PIDFD Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-09 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 3/3] syscalls/fanotify21: test returned pidfd from fanotify in FAN_REPORT_PIDFD mode Matthew Bobrowski via ltp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YZN8OLkeUUBP8yDK@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=repnop@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox