From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8DFDC433EF for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3473C8D68 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:20:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5DCD3C0D0B for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:20:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E55C600084 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:20:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B50F61FD49; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:20:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1637590847; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=H/wT7gCzMmdpBHVEfjTUlKTxmmDSRe1LoNF6QofWso0=; b=FUZf1jc60IFYIlTtK/4GMlcILG9ii5qdZ40sfSDezqa3T7GMk+lUzO3A2Wft+mKScS2iyC dNZKB3jP+BKT605uD3IdJW0hjTLLN0MXcZrvye1iuLpjBcqLY4ZLC1XckonV4f9dMspX2R OlmAZy3cy+dtdagYNr5tMUJf3tyu2Ys= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1637590847; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=H/wT7gCzMmdpBHVEfjTUlKTxmmDSRe1LoNF6QofWso0=; b=5j6uv+9rzN4yPe5oJfgtasYxXX9Xya25YpBb1kY5LAMtZDefos+mGXrF1oHmJkxFlHrj4M w4ae6HKN5eYTLCDw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A13E213B44; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id BIZRJj+nm2ErcQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:20:47 +0000 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:21:52 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Richard Palethorpe Message-ID: References: <20211117070708.2174932-1-liwang@redhat.com> <77e0b8b9-5de6-73ab-0f73-e3d95bad0935@jv-coder.de> <87bl2cmhuw.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bl2cmhuw.fsf@suse.de> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v5 1/3] lib: adding .supported_archs field in tst_test structure X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > I still don't understand how tst_arch.name is mapped to i386, i586 or > i686? > > It appears that we will always get TCONF on any of these architectures > because tst_arch.name will be set to x86 and the required arch will be > i386, i586 or i686. Can we please have single name for 32bit intel i.e. "x86" please? > > (From the above discussion I feel v5 is satisfied almost all of our > > requirements.) > > Otherwise, yes, I agree. Same here, the rest looks good. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp