From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] ustat0{1, 2}: Mark failure on Btrfs with known-fail tag
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 18:16:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdXShIOue2pXGr0C@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YdQpS0WPRvz4vZup@yuki>
Hi Cyril,
> > + .tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
> > + {"known-fail", "ustat() is known to fail with EINVAL on Btrfs"},
> ^
> Maybe we should just remove the
> "known to fail" from these messages.
> Since the code in the library will print:
> ---
> You _MAY_ be hit by known kernel failures:
> ustat() is known to fail with EINVAL on Btrfs
> ---
> so the 'known to fail' part is redundant here.
> What about:
> ---
> You _MAY_ be hit by known kernel failures:
> ustat() fails with EINVAL on Btrfs
> ---
+1
> Other than this I think that this is a good way how to put these kind of
> hints into the testcases.
> Also I do wonder if there is a good URL that would contain more verbose
> description of the problem but I guess there isn't. Well maybe this one:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg95697.html
Let's use lore.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAB=NE6X2-mbZwVFnKUwjRmTGp3auZFHQXJ1h_YTJ2driUeoR+A@mail.gmail.com/
But I'd put Josef Bacik's reply as he's a maintainer:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/e7e867b8-b57a-7eb2-2432-1627bd3a88fb@toxicpanda.com/
> Not sure how to encode that, maybe just add it to the test top level
> comment?
I'd prefer to have it in metadata html/pdf and in known-bug section.
Thus I'd prefer:
.tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
{"known-fail", "ustat() is known to fail with EINVAL on Btrfs, see "
"https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/e7e867b8-b57a-7eb2-2432-1627bd3a88fb@toxicpanda.com/"
},
{}
But while this is obviously ok for test output:
$ ./ustat01 -h
...
Tags
----
known-fail: ustat() is known to fail with EINVAL on Btrfs, see https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/e7e867b8-b57a-7eb2-2432-1627bd3a88fb@toxicpanda.com/
It gets parsed as new line:
"ustat01": {
"tags": [
[
"known-fail",
"ustat() is known to fail with EINVAL on Btrfs, see ",
"https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/e7e867b8-b57a-7eb2-2432-1627bd3a88fb@toxicpanda.com/"
]
],
"fname": "testcases/kernel/syscalls/ustat/ustat01.c"
}
Unless you think it's useful to expect that tag values can have longer input and
thus testinfo.pl should use all array items (except the first which is key),
I'd go the easy way and put the link only to top level docparse section as you
suggested.
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-05 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-03 15:13 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] lib: Add known-fail test tag Petr Vorel
2022-01-03 15:13 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] ustat0{1, 2}: Mark failure on Btrfs with known-fail tag Petr Vorel
2022-01-04 11:02 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-01-05 17:16 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2022-01-14 14:19 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-01-14 17:58 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YdXShIOue2pXGr0C@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox