From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] configure.ac: Fix summary for disabled metadata
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:49:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yebhgmc0e8hWtmPM@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YebY7ut/d0sT80HQ@yuki>
Hi Cyril,
> Hi!
> > Previously with --disable-metadata output didn't mention that metadata
> > are disabled and printed config which was not used. Now:
> > $ ./configure --disable-metadata
> > ...
> > METADATA
> > metadata disabled
> > $ ./configure
> > ...
> > METADATA
> > metadata generator: asciidoctor
> > HTML metadata: yes
> > PDF metadata: no
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> > ---
> > configure.ac | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> > index 3c56d19224..5b9e3c1781 100644
> > --- a/configure.ac
> > +++ b/configure.ac
> > @@ -404,7 +404,14 @@ libtirpc: ${have_libtirpc:-no}
> > glibc SUN-RPC: ${have_rpc_glibc:-no}
> > METADATA
> > +EOF
> > +
> > +if test "x$enable_metadata" = xyes; then
> > +cat << EOF
> > metadata generator: $with_metadata_generator
> > HTML metadata: $with_metadata_html
> > PDF metadata: $with_metadata_pdf
> Don't we stil have the same problem with "$enable_metadata_html" and
> "$enable_metadata_pdf" ?
Well, this patch was about configure output. I wouldn't print them at all if
metadata disabled. They're not used anyway in the code if metadata disabled.
> Also looking at m4/ltp-docparse.m4 shouldn't we just skip the
> autodetection if metadata are disabled and exit with all three wariables
> set to no?
Well, but that's how it is implemented:
$ ./configure --disable-metadata
...
configure: metadata generation disabled
And variables in config.log are:
METADATA_GENERATOR=''
WITH_METADATA='no'
WITH_METADATA_HTML='no'
WITH_METADATA_PDF='no'
It's a bit hard to write m4 macros when there is no return :).
It's hard to not fallback into many if/else levels.
I should have put some comments into the code.
Also, currently it's implemented that that we can disable both HTML and
PDF as: --disable-metadata-html --disable-metadata-pdf, maybe we could rethink
it.
> I think that we should rethink what the flags really do, I guess that
> for instance it would make sense for the $enable_metadata=no to just set
> both $enable_metadata_html and $enable_metadata_pdf to no and the rest
> of the m4/ltp-docparse.m4 should just check the later two.
Rethink the flags meaning or a functionality?
And how about flags names? What name would you suggest?
--disable-doc, --with-html-doc, --with-pdf-doc ?
Because we now have metadata (i.e. JSON output) mandatory.
I wonder what is needed to be fixed now and what's better to postpone after the
release?
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-18 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-14 12:55 [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] configure.ac: Fix summary for disabled metadata Petr Vorel
2022-01-14 13:12 ` Joerg Vehlow
2022-01-14 14:12 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-01-14 14:16 ` Joerg Vehlow
2022-01-14 14:23 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-01-14 14:27 ` Joerg Vehlow
2022-01-14 14:51 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-01-14 17:54 ` Petr Vorel
2022-01-14 17:44 ` Petr Vorel
2022-01-18 15:12 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-01-18 15:49 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2022-01-18 16:07 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-01-18 16:47 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yebhgmc0e8hWtmPM@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox