From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 287FEC433EF for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7753C9727 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:54:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AB863C96C2 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:54:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02E18200085 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:54:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0520421972; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:54:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1642773287; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PoLRDSo1SOoPQsfO6GqdQBAayVTOEp3P+b3PxYW1Psc=; b=wQWMX9RkzS0P/6k/HK+D+yMuYh77l1XwNgZxXt9g8VE59nHLl96iacBPfEY6KmQJxfarDk e6MxgiDoOG1ls63AL4l/usVLGdBHo6rqyGqp7FFRjKzlCgNdB2HYP9UB770Tvx28WkG5lU tCMQAa3m+w17RkgF+su5KYUgtNuykRU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1642773287; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PoLRDSo1SOoPQsfO6GqdQBAayVTOEp3P+b3PxYW1Psc=; b=z3KsrHKa7YmJXHy7eI0UGrnbVpHMyKAKsIjPEEgN63w6IH1hEgegdLZRplqYngLX1Eeawh heQHE9TXMW9vsXAw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE48D13941; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id CmYEMSa76mHNVgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:54:46 +0000 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:54:45 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: References: <20220121103011.6266-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <4508acbd-3ca2-b1b4-ff38-6ffa573aa6fd@suse.cz> <5988d540-ce29-d210-365e-7e5efa91b547@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5988d540-ce29-d210-365e-7e5efa91b547@suse.cz> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] aiodio: Set timeout 30 min X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > On 21. 01. 22 14:33, Petr Vorel wrote: > >> Hi, > >> only dio_sparse really needs higher timeout because we use it for a slow > >> stress test in a runfile. dio_read should get a lower default number of > >> child processes instead (8 or 16 to keep the default memory requirements > >> under 512MB). > > Thanks! > > I also noticed dio_read, but as you pointed out it's already fixed by > > f3caabe44c ("Reduce memory footprint of the dio_read test") > Runfile usage is fixed but running the program manually with default > setting would still result in extreme memory use. We should make the > defaults more sensible as well. +1. So do we want in the end to increase dio_read just for now before release? That'd make sense to me. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp