From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA47C433EF for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714473C96E5 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:35:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25D633C9424 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:35:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFA93601483 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:35:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2A7E210E0; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:35:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1642761322; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NVKDbrRcMVEmp4+C5TNfzf9zevwd0V07MAOLr03jvFw=; b=wkX6++FSc/F4Pb6K+5U8xL/GUmrWq4SaTiFTzAKbAW45QcRqUI2aOI+3id+Vo1uDc4j6rq FlZqjiRt4m16pqRWoPnTza2FOpl93tQ8N/2y83nL8VmFOG/ukjKPf0quLI7qdJJrPmDKAo D1eV1Vyfhi7QF7F5KFID/9Dz/mcndDI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1642761322; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NVKDbrRcMVEmp4+C5TNfzf9zevwd0V07MAOLr03jvFw=; b=tdF/XjdDqLbtKe4bsK5s+LHdhNUTCAQIzIRn7FT+vipHSFbkSC7CrDe8Ms0iuEpN/4om44 //WiHoRiDZ+bSwDw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0AB213C32; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id 4I6sKWqM6mEAcgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:35:22 +0000 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:37:07 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20220121100604.1072-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] aiodio: Skip tests on tmpfs X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > tmpfs does not support it. > Verifying with .all_filesystems, that only tmpfs is problematic > - tested on exfat, ntfs over FUSE, vfat (common linux filesystems obviously work) > > That's why I avoided opening file with O_DIRECT in setup(). > > BTW I wonder what is the reason of duplicate entries in ltp-aiodio.part4? > i.e. dio_sparse, aiodio_append, dio_append, dio_truncate... > To create bigger load? > > IMHO it'd make sense to run at least one test on .all_filesystems to check more > filesystems (dio_append seems to be quick), but I wouldn't done it when there > are duplicate entries. Historicall mess I guess. We will clean that up in the next development cycle. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp