public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sysctl/sysctl03: Test whether return EINVAL when passing negative value
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:31:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfPGDmF0UFFjeABu@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1643349071-2164-1-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>

Hi!
> +#!/bin/sh
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +# Copyright (c) 2022 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
> +# Author: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
> +#
> +# When we pass a negative value to the proc_doulongvec_minmax() function,
> +# the function should return EINVAL and the corresponding interface value
> +# does not change.
> +#
> +# It is also a regression test for
> +# commit 1622ed7d0743 ("sysctl: returns -EINVAL when a negative value is passed
> +# to proc_doulongvec_minmax").
> +#
> +# Use fs.epoll.max_user_watches interface to test this.
> +
> +TST_TESTFUNC=do_test
> +TST_SETUP=setup
> +TST_NEEDS_ROOT=1
> +TST_NEEDS_CMDS="sysctl"
> +TST_NEEDS_KCONFIGS="CONFIG_SYSCTL=y, CONFIG_PROC_FS=y, CONFIG_INOTIFY_USER=y"
> +sys_name="fs.epoll.max_user_watches"
> +sys_file="/proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_watches"
> +
> +. tst_test.sh
> +
> +setup()
> +{
> +	orig_value=$(cat "$sys_file")
> +}
> +
> +do_test()
> +{
> +	tst_res TINFO "trying to set $sys_name=-1"
> +
> +	sysctl -w -q $sys_name=-1 2>&1 | grep -q "Invalid argument"
> +
> +	if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
> +		tst_res TPASS "sysctl returns EINVAL when passing a negative value"
> +	else
> +		tst_res TFAIL "sysctl doesn't return EINVAL when passing a negative value"
> +	fi
> +
> +	new_value=$(cat "$sys_file")
> +	if [ $orig_value -eq $new_value ]; then
> +		tst_res TPASS "the interface value doesn't change when passing a negative value"
> +	else
> +		tst_res TFAIL "the interface value changes when passing a negative value"
> +		sysctl -w -q $sys_name=$orig_value
> +	fi
> +}
> +
> +tst_run

I'm just wondering if this wouldn't be actually easier as a C test. I
bet that simple write() to the sys_file would work exactly the same and
we wouldn't depend on sysctl being present on the system.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-28 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-28  5:51 [LTP] [PATCH] sysctl/sysctl03: Test whether return EINVAL when passing negative value Yang Xu
2022-01-28 10:31 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2022-01-30  2:24   ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-02-16 12:59     ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YfPGDmF0UFFjeABu@yuki \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox