From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A51EC433EF for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 11:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6173C98DB for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:13:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC8683C8F4A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:13:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EC0F600830 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:13:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 592DA2110B; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 11:13:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1643800412; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=ihC2d5T5P1pfZF4Fc9yQj/OKoi26WfVx7ryaYf26EXk=; b=OS2qCRtKkAJztulBUQ2+QSYfxbeiBRtoJo3CoguqXBSgnWFh1TpocBAztZMw2+yHzg0SSx UzLOMKW+6K/Rxaw4/oN+FXaebaF7jtTq0dWjlTggmVI6j2qfJeEz6h8IBZi/kKa1jGivKY TGmYe6gfqiYEV0qU0BsWkAAR8PC5TgY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1643800412; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=ihC2d5T5P1pfZF4Fc9yQj/OKoi26WfVx7ryaYf26EXk=; b=rBj71y76HdzdkNMM9chJHARyWcKgeZQPl+XOb/6EeaPv+W0phBDnt4l4q+cv8SuNaL0BcR +Cpp0ftvGCpzdmBg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16F2213E05; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 11:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id olvrA1xn+mGMfQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 02 Feb 2022 11:13:32 +0000 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:13:25 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: [LTP] [RFC] SCTP tests in LTP vs. on github.com/sctp X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Xin Long , Neil Horman , Vlad Yasevich , Martin Doucha Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi all, SCTP tests lksctp-tools [1] are also in LTP [2]. IMHO it's not worth to have it on both places. lksctp-tools looks like to be the official ones [3] so maybe drop it from LTP? Version in LTP was updated to 1.0.15 some time ago (upstream has 1.0.19, containing various fixes [4], maybe worth to be backported to lksctp-tools? Frankly speaking even being older version the LTP code looks to me better. One test was even rewritten to LTP new C API [5] in order to apply more improvements [6]. BTW I'd really recommend lksctp-tools project to take new LTP C API [7] and rewrite tests into it. But are these tests still relevant? (is it worth of work?) Kind regards, Petr [1] https://github.com/sctp/lksctp-tools [2] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/tree/master/utils/sctp [3] https://github.com/sctp [4] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/commits/master/utils/sctp [5] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/commit/fcd43b3dd7a8e8fab2b03ec9fa659f21ff5cecb2 [6] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/commit/fcd43b3dd7a8e8fab2b03ec9fa659f21ff5cecb2 [7] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/wiki/C-Test-API -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp