From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBB76C433EF for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 16:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B28F3C98D1 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:57:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A18B3C989C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:57:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1074D2002C1 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:57:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B3B21110; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 16:57:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1643821037; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9jF8Bs3HTOn12sXQ/zQWRv1Mody7bEDmU4n3TIWFpgg=; b=15vQrP2KvZgO28J6TBmx5D7dCGO4NLdfJfDp4JJRxP+xfdUgIcydE9SaVebPeq0++Jkcfd pyEswqInWtk6KZLwUo3LCFZwdZVh4HOm2nknQ4GjQXIKuvLVnaY+KMRzS+z1Ukh6en3tmG lscUPEmF5mYEmuMZHwKl4zjVBG7acZ4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1643821037; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9jF8Bs3HTOn12sXQ/zQWRv1Mody7bEDmU4n3TIWFpgg=; b=BUpDgri3PyC6tkBmbSfWor5cwePlT0Q0oyR+n04gX8NEwICiWv4nbtKXhxQgpCfAqHybAQ 1AMJM6R/TVfN+fCQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E02A013E99; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 16:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id TN+KNOy3+mG6QQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 02 Feb 2022 16:57:16 +0000 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:57:15 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: References: <20211118235744.802584-1-krisman@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: kernel@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov , Matthew Bobrowski , Jan Kara , Ext4 , Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi! > > > In any case, Petr, I suggest adding a short timeout to the test > > > instead of the default 5min. > > > Test takes less than 1 second on my VM on v5.16, so... > > We usually don't lower the default timeout, but here it's a good idea since here > > it blocks. It's similar speed on my machine, but I'd be conservative and put > > timeout 10 sec. Sending patch. > Actually I hope to change the default timeout once I finish my runtime > patchset to something more reasonable as majority of LTP tests finish > under one second. +1. We can then revert that temporary fix for fanotify22. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp