From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71DF1C433F5 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2683CA071 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:54:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E03253C9B68 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:54:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0752E600D2E for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:54:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27A481F37D; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:54:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1645005260; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hNvIaaE64YPXsyZ5M30Oznojxagu6D+q9Ji91hERn7Y=; b=ynG1tdSRMBO+GqIwAqJXSjPD1sqHoaTR0+v1EjQRuzpiSMjYLuWCUL+gLus6tqKtcXHwDS xE5G2niU/ci8Ou061udoUKpKQQIC2WVEBbiao6LCokGnJdjz3JDzyF61hAFVULoTXt0+so n0hHomrHyYmfaYpJ00pzkeUyI1ImjJM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1645005260; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hNvIaaE64YPXsyZ5M30Oznojxagu6D+q9Ji91hERn7Y=; b=kMOOqMgra+PFlOeQ7gmVaR8ZA1eZ51VQ3DemX8P1pltz2/+XUqEsn94Nv2ZTKPHWSBtOAq UwGAAmMOnQp4zJBA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 104DB13A9F; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id I4wDAszJDGKYfAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:54:20 +0000 Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:54:09 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: <20220208132414.2852202-1-liwang@redhat.com> <20220209085213.2882229-1-liwang@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220209085213.2882229-1-liwang@redhat.com> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] getrusage03: mlock all address space for process calling consume_mb X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrusage/getrusage03.c > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrusage/getrusage03.c > @@ -193,4 +193,8 @@ static struct tst_test test = { > .setup = setup, > .test = run, > .tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(testfunc_list), > + .caps = (struct tst_cap []) { > + TST_CAP(TST_CAP_REQ, CAP_IPC_LOCK), > + {} > + }, > }; I wonder if we should start to track the capabilities like this instead of the .needs_root approach. I guess that it may be useful to keep things granular in the future. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp