From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D6FAC433F5 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 11:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712523CA183 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:12:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5CDD3CA105 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:12:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4601220A6D5 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:11:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6476721128; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 11:11:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1645787519; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RdPFH0vFtGUAw07EEELXvA7jLvv8DmNki10PUPVQ4zY=; b=dp2Zl08q8F37E4biDsTkk8rx2huDGVIRXFEBDAPIKlX+2zOYjBhK8DVElNGycm1dPyKyYC fEnKg9o07dJHXBRW1oKCkilO4gOzZUmm3d3pRqwRmXO0m1Cni2D9wOzUn0YOAQysOL371S 5UHNEgQI7xX8J2thctlkDfol2mr0Ei0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1645787519; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RdPFH0vFtGUAw07EEELXvA7jLvv8DmNki10PUPVQ4zY=; b=zu+YdMyGmWxGkg9Lo1KxVSE9nFOZXhCwnbO3+ARwyxSsaAIvRcrsBlJU8BHitaKPU5E9Xx wsTj5Reuftt/VTBg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F4C913519; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 11:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id RUcaEn+5GGI8CQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 25 Feb 2022 11:11:59 +0000 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:14:14 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20220225110152.26098-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220225110152.26098-1-pvorel@suse.cz> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] ci/debian: Temporarily not require libmm-dev X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > do we even need libmm-dev? > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libmm-dev/filelist > ... > /usr/bin/mm-config > /usr/include/mm.h > /usr/lib/libmm.a > /usr/lib/libmm.so I do not think so. The only places where I found that we include mm.h are actually a kernel modules and that include should be satisfied from kernel-devel package. So I guess that this has been added as a mistake to begin with. Reviewed-by: Cyril Hrubis -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp