From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F180CC433F5 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 07:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A0B3C94F2 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:31:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 044DE3C8C94 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:31:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 776B1601622 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:31:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7071C1F38E; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 07:31:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1647588698; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Fg2NfRsJWT5gfxMaUIFiAhzG5JVJM4Df5K0bmVaavtw=; b=ihmPHKvDBcAaFZvcplFnMNbT2tSuXeRiGGTBu3fljKiYggAcLQnxmZ7EtrsWbEW2/dPyXw pTujf4xqQHEA7FouDTfuOusGbMAVz7N+ZSWdCpcBVxzHSxrEDG6Nk6QHTtQqJ9OeFM+Ksd 716p0aUvSWll8fANfNYHp5Lmv9KdSB4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1647588698; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Fg2NfRsJWT5gfxMaUIFiAhzG5JVJM4Df5K0bmVaavtw=; b=bRDfD9YRuF/f4aTiWtnPyZ5Hm8O0gpaJyZZPEDNjQQSV8OxnurBrUY5Wn3s4LZyPiBDFRc WfNN0IluzmpaUjCw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37AC012FC5; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 07:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id t+PtClo1NGLKEQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 18 Mar 2022 07:31:38 +0000 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:31:36 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: <20220316150429.2873-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] ci: Ubuntu xenial -> bionic X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Li, Cyril, > Hi Petr, > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:08 PM Petr Vorel wrote: > > Tested > > * bionic > > https://github.com/pevik/ltp/actions/runs/1993375270 > > * focal > > https://github.com/pevik/ltp/actions/runs/1993443143 > > And as I noted xenial still works. I wanted to avoid false positives when > > repos > > get down, but obviously we have 4 years time (ends in 01 Apr 2026). > +1 for bionic. (we can do an upgrade to focal when bionic reach EOL) > According to the release cycle page[1] of ubuntu ORG, the > Xenial (16.04) version is being deprecated, which means > no hardware and maintenance updates anymore. But we (LTP) > still merging new features and regression testcases, I'm afraid > that will bring some known failures in Xenial then to cost energy > for debugging. So you'd keep Xenial until the end of it's Extended Security Maintenance (ESM) support in 2026? I'm not sure myself if it's a good idea to drop Xenial now and solve these problems. Maybe we should hold this change for some time. And if we upgrade to bionic, it would be good to finish a docs of supported kernel/(g)libc/distro versions. Kind regards, Petr > [1]https://ubuntu.com/about/release-cycle -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp