From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin Doucha <martin.doucha@suse.com>, LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] mkswap01: wait for the triggered events to complete
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 09:47:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmEMJeVpJHqxG8si@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEemH2d=r90AUhNzqHFc8mQFHd-eQeEHLebUaJhXNNwUVb=rpA@mail.gmail.com>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:18 AM Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 4:56 AM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
> >> > - udevadm trigger --name-match=$TST_DEVICE
> >> > + udevadm trigger --name-match=$TST_DEVICE --settle
> >> > if [ -n "$device" ]; then
> >> > mkswap_verify "$mkswap_op" "$op_arg" "$device" "$size"
> >> "$dev_file"
> >> --settle option for udevadm trigger has been added in v238 (in 2018) [1].
> >> This mean on SLES 12-SP5, RHEL-7.9, 18.04 LTS bionic, ... we get:
> >> trigger: unrecognized option '--settle'
> > Thanks for pointing out this, Petr.
> >> Do we ignore backward compatibility hoping that all distros aren't tested
> >> with
> >> newer LTP?
> > Actually, we only use fixed older-version of LTP for long-term supported
> > distros (e.g RHEL6/7) testing, as it falls into maintaining phase and no
> > new
> > features are added in. So this won't be a problem for us.
> > But if we consider fully backward compatibility of newer LTP for old
> > distros,
> > this is a burden to maintaining work. We might need to make a balance on
> > the patch accept or reject.
> > With regard to this simple patch, if you think it's a problem to SLES
> > 12-SP5, I'm
> > fine to NAK and rewrite with another way (at least for ioctl09 I will do
> > that).
> > But if you're OK with making use of fixed LTP on older distros, feel free
> > to apply this one :).
> Or, just go with the traditional way for compatibility:
> --- a/testcases/commands/mkswap/mkswap01.sh
> +++ b/testcases/commands/mkswap/mkswap01.sh
> @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ mkswap_test()
> return
> fi
> - udevadm trigger --name-match=$TST_DEVICE --settle
> + udevadm trigger --name-match=$TST_DEVICE
> + udevadm settle --exit-if-exists==$TST_DEVICE
IMHO that'd be better (--exit-if-exists was added in 2009 in udev 174).
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Kind regards,
Petr
> if [ -n "$device" ]; then
> mkswap_verify "$mkswap_op" "$op_arg" "$device" "$size"
> "$dev_file"
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 11:47 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] ioctl09: wait for udevd complete the uevent handling Li Wang
2022-04-20 11:47 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] mkswap01: wait for the triggered events to complete Li Wang
2022-04-20 12:07 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-04-20 20:56 ` Petr Vorel
2022-04-21 2:18 ` Li Wang
2022-04-21 6:44 ` Li Wang
2022-04-21 7:47 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2022-04-20 12:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] ioctl09: wait for udevd complete the uevent handling Cyril Hrubis
2022-04-20 12:31 ` Li Wang
2022-04-20 12:52 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-04-21 6:36 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YmEMJeVpJHqxG8si@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=liwang@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=martin.doucha@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox