From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44801C433F5 for ; Thu, 5 May 2022 08:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0D73CA8A8 for ; Thu, 5 May 2022 10:47:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F37E73CA789 for ; Thu, 5 May 2022 10:47:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A80F1A009BE for ; Thu, 5 May 2022 10:47:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 273AB218EB; Thu, 5 May 2022 08:47:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1651740423; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KZ1Li3gq8hmuZkBNyaj+Pr2y85neJjkkN9Raw7KHBh8=; b=w37levZ0SvtORtmLYKK65OIEYkygpDaEuzk7azyVZ+tXVIGxxi0hctVd1iZwe54CvrLA5s mrHCqSUtSo7EZXrfPLwaGYNolWWjmkJDySU/lAgtHwahUoRSEbeccNoWBXeKC30EIyuIe3 4gItoi1LruLB5M1rGjXm2Dt1SR3F6is= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1651740423; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KZ1Li3gq8hmuZkBNyaj+Pr2y85neJjkkN9Raw7KHBh8=; b=HYeKHgHBPLefllMarlj2TLyKwFgqXFFZMw0pTNoQh53E/bKvy8qA1Ruba/DC28CNhjAdlr Cx9DqJtlTFShd9Bg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB14B13B11; Thu, 5 May 2022 08:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id BUu7NwaPc2JWFwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 05 May 2022 08:47:02 +0000 Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 10:47:01 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Richard Palethorpe Message-ID: References: <20220503174718.21205-1-chrubis@suse.cz> <875ymke631.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <875ymke631.fsf@suse.de> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [Automated-testing] [PATCH v2 00/30] Introduce runtime and conver tests X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi all, > > TODO: > > This patchset is reasonably complete in a sense that it removes the > > timeout API at the end. Still there are a few things to consider: > > - is reusing the -I parameter a good idea? Wouldn't adding new parameter > > (-r) be better? But -r is using only when .max_iteration_runtime set, right? How should it behave on tests which don't set it? Should -I and -r be mutually exclusive? Maybe reusing -I would be simpler for users. > Perhaps we could deprecate -I, but convert it to use the new mechanism > while trying to keep the behaviour similar. > I'm not sure we need a global -r option, but unlike -i it's not much > effort to support. It would not surprise me if there are existing tests > which don't work with -i. ^^ Do you mean -I ? Kind regards, Petr > > - there are quite likely tests that run for more than a second or a two > > and should be made runtime aware > > - anything else? -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp