From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0602CC433EF for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 13:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B133CA44E for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 15:52:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 229E63CA44E for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 15:52:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 982882001CA for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 15:52:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B65991F8B5; Tue, 10 May 2022 13:52:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1652190764; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0+ZezYm5Yql+8X1nKVfzh5SLhfreLHRurQDQfiY7x4I=; b=0zQsS4BCdbBetx1o1V5+qh/ENNJ6HaWc03hFz+wQkjXLAk0VO3dmdLZcytXotsdBMtiVnd mTy+q0AP1xX9aeNsDcYWjJmZ9Kz049cD2x0GSPAozRipWoO7+A8xaS29ET2wCplHYO5K/2 JGbzQzaaPzDryAFnVY6XtHlYYtU+rEM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1652190764; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0+ZezYm5Yql+8X1nKVfzh5SLhfreLHRurQDQfiY7x4I=; b=Cu65Skq6QeK3Gli7uAcHojUZtiprrZ/tiRap0P3zetgK6xZ7709R6jT/w50G6LxTEncvlc gB8OtqpgzwrdCABA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3C4A13AA5; Tue, 10 May 2022 13:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id EAfQJixuemLrNgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 10 May 2022 13:52:44 +0000 Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 15:54:57 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] LTP release preparations X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > As for me I would like to get the runtime patchset in if possible. > > > > +1, I will add my review ASAP. Thx. > > What else should be considered for the release? > > > > > 1628025 New [v2] rtc02: loosen the compare precision with few > seconds > 1625610 New [1/2] lapi/mount.h: Remove > 1625609 New [2/2] Remove duplicate include of > > also, I vote for adding expand Cgroup library from Luke's patchset, but > if time is hurrying I'm fine without it as well. I would vote for getting the cgroup patchset in as well here, even if that would delay the release by a few days. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp