From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC0A7C433F5 for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 11:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133813CA98C for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 13:45:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24A4C3CA4FA for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 13:45:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E14F600425 for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 13:45:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E5031F8FA; Wed, 11 May 2022 11:45:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1652269541; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DtJJqncUcFfWtzI9g+8ma37RUET+hS/yIbjCeJjbrG0=; b=yMnV76UAtKPIcRu12745DCgVz6cDj2/MgGOGWg+9ocsUqaXaX3DSknmUPvlLug25E/b6po +tM9s8RZ8ojzT7lBkSajdRPAsvluw5vFZS2BUL/e6nzC6UwAXv3BtPJ9vO5fNT5/Sdq/vQ HFHMfkLa5IfTXIPhLB3qmObq3s0bt0c= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1652269541; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DtJJqncUcFfWtzI9g+8ma37RUET+hS/yIbjCeJjbrG0=; b=Vq1wb7cWO3kWSeIHIqTk1i8jb+J30g59xscJTaPdXAJtOOEwkdbgRLKNP1fQ4Mbj3tF8Pp dYC6DjF55anyHnAw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B7A913A76; Wed, 11 May 2022 11:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id ddZ6IeWhe2K7UAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 11 May 2022 11:45:41 +0000 Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 13:47:55 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: <20220503174718.21205-1-chrubis@suse.cz> <20220503174718.21205-2-chrubis@suse.cz> <87a6bwe7ps.fsf@suse.de> <87fslocm83.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [Automated-testing] [PATCH v2 01/30] Introduce a concept of max runtime X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: LTP List , automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > I suppose it is the innermost runtime, so I would vote for inner_runtime > > or just runtime. However whatever it is called it will require > > > > I do really have the same feelings here. I'm even afraid 'iteration' will > confused people who are not familiar with ltp-library. > > From my comprehension, max_iteration_runtime takes effect on every > onefold test iteration, or maybe just directly rename to 'max_test_runtime' > (or max_runtime) with explanation in code comments. Okay then, I guess that we will simply go with max_runtime then and describe that it applies to a single call of the run() function in the comments. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp