From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECBFCC433EF for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 11:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C8D3CAAEA for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 13:30:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF2453CA948 for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 13:30:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 641B41000DD7 for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 13:30:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CFEB21B2A; Fri, 20 May 2022 11:30:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1653046217; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aLb21+MvJC0LBgr7KuIpOF5cxMPOjVi3p8I1Fj4++CI=; b=FJxQ9Tg1bW/w6GVUato4lgk0B/NyH/b/1PKrZ/ZU6+Q91iWhmK7zL/la/2/YN1xGw5U8zU X7FZNpXDza+F2aCf969jhAYUbkxx64ji6qvVFRvNhmLrSs4J+szW8dst02HxMUgHOHgJ5d 0F60CJRIJIP5ejCEp2y3LR+5bhYuWNk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1653046217; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aLb21+MvJC0LBgr7KuIpOF5cxMPOjVi3p8I1Fj4++CI=; b=FSRrl07o0EwTB/EHDYP4KLrrRTXG001G/hEsmv5aF3eCUs7LY2MPga0MiseQ2ECVC9/7Hm vJRL/dOj+htKfNAA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6337913A5F; Fri, 20 May 2022 11:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id YtFEFsl7h2JyKwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 20 May 2022 11:30:17 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 13:30:15 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: References: <20220519121056.1181-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> <20220519121056.1181-2-mdoucha@suse.cz> <10ee5852-9302-22d7-832c-f581ef94c336@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] pty04: Fix cleanup X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi! > > > I don't see why. Running pty07 with -i0 was actually quite helpful in > > > debugging this issue. If a test fails when executed with -i0, it needs > > > to be fixed. > > Do you mean that -i0 is useful to test only setup and cleanup in C API? > > If we agree we want this (not against it if it's useful), shell API should > > be unified with it (my concern was that both APIs should behave the same on > > the same getopt option). > It never occured to me that -i0 can be used to test that setup and > cleanup are coded properly but it makes a lot of sense. OK, I might send a patch for shell implementing it, but it has a lower priority (there are other patches which should make it to get into the release than this). Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp