From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34D2AC433EF for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CB13C8F8E for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:27:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF7003C01AA for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:26:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6F25140017C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:26:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1C111F9B7; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:26:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1654594010; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CkMTW2aF+jhJRPu96EBzx3OSfryMvyVxFELHSzk8syY=; b=dK7LZuwjohFAZ3EU64w5wZJwAY2NSkXvN94cKHkAXpi1DBoebO3aoKlvs+SvV+tYtJnobD M3TdTkWeHyYldZ8pL3/aFORtbWOFHzwWjTD2u5EhqtD4gdhKiciK72bU+77zHW2oH5zXkz dgEKCiol0ipbwIx6wxpmE8BQ+72Exv0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1654594010; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CkMTW2aF+jhJRPu96EBzx3OSfryMvyVxFELHSzk8syY=; b=i6PbMk+yBNpp73hI+kPGCiD9eNRlNLLNNWNWlmEpsNRxRj6AcsFUrSP2UV96zPXqhhs3i0 fJhTLyd5ccyennBw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF91013638; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id t06/NdoZn2IEMwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 07 Jun 2022 09:26:50 +0000 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:28:57 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: <20220606100034.169493-1-liwang@redhat.com> <20220606100034.169493-3-liwang@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/2] memfd_create03: make use of new .hugepages X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel > > > > Very nice, thanks :). I guess move_pages12.c can also use .hugepages, > > right? > > > > Hmm, I guess that is a bit different from using .hugepages, it needs > reserve page against each node. But our improvement only target for > test does not care about huge page from which nodes:). I guess that it would be probaly easier to add support for numa into the include/tst_numa.h library. But may not be worth of the effort as long as we have only one test of that kind. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp