From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDB56C43334 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6443C8DD5 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:41:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 651973C0162 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:41:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2D514004F0 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:41:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7766221B7A; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:41:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1654594900; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sjpc/U7z8VZbEYPmpc1dmqHvRBIhBH95hsmHh2wkOyM=; b=3W10+G8F3eHZWlux56Ifa5wcpXR3UBU7JesBPqB/atOM3gbg+xFfHDXCfnJEPO1ilqEUnS 9DE6ID/URSUrp4Aq3ChssAaiGV/rIuC64Qc7tASZDfArrwO9rnPuBSy2AMPCXFahbFsUE2 HMBYwuy6Vhd7sMekLiMphyuOF/cFEr4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1654594900; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sjpc/U7z8VZbEYPmpc1dmqHvRBIhBH95hsmHh2wkOyM=; b=PdZq8pY+vaBXEuSbflkL1ZB11C1+VzWvgsReZbZMLR/N5MnEP9GSYpZ50lcy5IdXQNavkn Cp1AEodf+g+CUvDg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B6B213638; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id hozqEFQdn2KWOQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 07 Jun 2022 09:41:40 +0000 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:41:38 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: References: <20220606100034.169493-1-liwang@redhat.com> <20220606100034.169493-3-liwang@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/2] memfd_create03: make use of new .hugepages X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi! > > > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel > > > Very nice, thanks :). I guess move_pages12.c can also use .hugepages, > > > right? > > Hmm, I guess that is a bit different from using .hugepages, it needs > > reserve page against each node. But our improvement only target for > > test does not care about huge page from which nodes:). > I guess that it would be probaly easier to add support for numa into the > include/tst_numa.h library. But may not be worth of the effort as long > as we have only one test of that kind. Agree. Thanks both for your explanation. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp