From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D1B6C00140 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1977D3C966D for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:45:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DDD13C1FED for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:44:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FF321400183 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:44:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26C65372BA; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:44:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1660567495; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LXf6r32wj1p2GHLn0u62xN2Gd5AiwdzyzA2rjC57cu8=; b=Iu+GMgwz6o2eTlFevdhiyUjAQVbH3A4hOK/+a/5I8xpCXiMaDVHK8fdGYHNqpaEYEY86Xn Hp5y5u9LylY1sxObP/Q29MLP4drEJ3ufB1JoD74EmCXosdVNLTAjf4ye7S+lW9Zm0a0Y1Q 8ZjWyhHirsfHcbqGk3iTJP60hhNYwi4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1660567495; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LXf6r32wj1p2GHLn0u62xN2Gd5AiwdzyzA2rjC57cu8=; b=RpjG6HY+ViQtvf9LiQVCedRkz+fTZEG+0fvJZ0NbMEctM0lZQkv4vOARtlNX6J1VBOi+OB HEs4ClxwL7mGhaCQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC87F13A99; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id mbcIMMY/+mKJMgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:44:54 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:44:53 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] Backport d4ae9916ea29 ("mm: soft-offline: close the race against page allocation") to 4.14 and 4.9 X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Naoya Horiguchi , stable@vger.kernel.org, William Roche , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 01:10:07PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi all, > > I wonder if there was an attempt to backport d4ae9916ea29 ("mm: soft-offline: > > close the race against page allocation") from 4.19 to 4.14 and 4.9 (patch does > > not apply, haven't found anything on stable ML, nor in stable tree git, > > therefore I assume it was left as not easily fixable). > As it didn't apply, why not try creating a backport to test this > yourself? I'll gladly accept such a thing into the trees if you make > it. Hi Greg, thanks for info, I might give it a try. Kind regards, Petr > thanks, > greg k-h -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp