Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] Refactor pidns30 test using new LTP API
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:07:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvphPfNzlDY6MM9r@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220812075005.16920-1-andrea.cervesato@suse.com>

Hi!
> +static void child_signal_handler(LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED int sig, siginfo_t *si, LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED void *unused)
>  {
> -	char buf[256];
> -	struct mq_attr attr;
> -
> -	if (si->si_signo != SIGUSR1) {
> -		printf("received signal = %d unexpectedly\n", si->si_signo);
> +	if (si->si_signo != SIGUSR1 || si->si_code != SI_MESGQ || si->si_pid != 0)
>  		return;
> -	}
>  
> -	if (si->si_code != SI_MESGQ) {
> -		printf("expected signal code SI_MESGQ; got %d instead\n",
> -		       si->si_code);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (si->si_pid) {
> -		printf("expected signal originator PID = 0; got %d instead\n",
> -		       si->si_pid);
> -		return;
> -	} else {
> -		printf("signal originator PID = 0\n");
> -		result = TPASS;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Now read the message - Be silent on errors since this is not the
> -	 * test purpose.
> -	 */
> -	rc = mq_getattr(si->si_int, &attr);
> -	if (rc != -1)
> -		mq_receive(si->si_int, buf, attr.mq_msgsize, NULL);
> +	received++;

I do not like that much that we lost most of the information about the
failure here. Can we store at least the si_signo and si_pid so that they
can be printed in the case of the failure?

> -int main(void)
> +static void run(void)
>  {
> -	int status;
> -	char buf[5];
> -	pid_t cpid;
> -
> -	setup();
> -
> -	if (pipe(child_to_father) == -1 || pipe(father_to_child) == -1) {
> -		tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "pipe failed");
> -	}
> +	int ret;
>  
> -	tst_syscall(__NR_mq_unlink, mqname);
> +	remove_mqueue(mqd);
>  
> -	/* container creation on PID namespace */
> -	cpid = ltp_clone_quick(CLONE_NEWPID | SIGCHLD, child_fn, NULL);
> -	if (cpid == -1)
> -		tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "clone failed");
> +	ret = ltp_clone_quick(CLONE_NEWPID | SIGCHLD, child_func, NULL);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "clone failed");
>  
> -	mqd =
> -	    tst_syscall(__NR_mq_open, mqname, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0777,
> -		    NULL);
> +	mqd = mq_open(MQNAME, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0777, 0);
>  	if (mqd == -1)
> -		tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "mq_open failed");
> -	else
> -		tst_resm(TINFO, "successfully created posix mqueue");
> +		tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "mq_open failed");

We allready have SAFE_MQ_OPEN() I guess that we may add the rest of the
SAFE_MQ_* calls as well and use them here.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-15 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-12  7:50 [LTP] [PATCH v2] Refactor pidns30 test using new LTP API Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2022-08-15 15:07 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YvphPfNzlDY6MM9r@yuki \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox